|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I'm not sure what kind FACT you are talking about.
But, the FACT that they, BMI, DTN, Futuresource and maybe others force us to sign a contract in which we can't downgrade once we upgrade,,say from delayed data to real-time is a very SOLID FACT.
I recently spoke to one of the DTN sales rep and he told the same FACT.
He added that he would like to help me out on this,,,being flexible btwn delayed and real-time data,,,
but that was the company's policy. Even the sale reps understand that it's BAD business practice.
We, as consumers, have to be able to choose what kind of products we want and use.
I second Mitch,,except we have to find an alternative,,instead bad mouthing,,,and I'm stuck there,,can't find one. Maybe one who's wiser than I could come up with an idea.
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 6/2/98, at 9:52 AM, Peter2150@xxxxxxx wrote:
>In a message dated 98-06-02 12:39:37 EDT, MitchT@xxxxxxx writes:
>
>> I was away and just got this.....this is where I think being a part of a
>> large
>> trading group (real traders) can be used. I think we as a group should
>> e-mail BMI and
>> tell them we resent treating our members this way. We should each
>> e-mail individually.
>> Write a form letter saying let me out or else these 100 traders will go
>> out of their way to bad mouth
>> your service. Include the address where to foward it and I for one will
>> sign it and send it on to BMI
>
>To all
>
> I find this a silly thing. First of all like it or not there is a
>contract. 2ndly we don't know if BMI was willing to work with the person
>involved. We only have one side. I am sure not going to write any
>threatening letters. Dumb. I need the data, and its been the most reliable
>so far. I am not going to threaten to bad mouth them over something I don't
>have the full facts on and put my lively hood at risk.
>
> Pete
|