|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
David Cicia wrote:
> The point is not that there be no subjective interpetations at all but
> that the range of possible subjective interpretations in Astrology is much
> much larger than for interpreting, say RSI, and it is therefore extremely
> prone to subjective projections, i.e. you put something there from your own
> psyche that isn't there in the data.
> For instance, what does mars conjunt the moon mean? Mars has a range of
> meanings from aggressiveness to warlike to instigating to panic, etc. etc.
David, The vagueness in your interpretation here comes from incomplete
information. You did not statein what sign the Moon and Mars are located. Had
you stated in what sign these two planets were locted, a very precise and
objective interpretation could be rendered. So, I totally disagree with your
contention about Financial Astrology being subjective. I have taught over 100
students and those who do the required work to learn tend to arrive at the same
highly accurage answers given the same factors. Perhaps you should contact me
via private e-mail so that we can "hone" your Astrological interpretations of
the markets?
Regards,
Norman
> Moon has a similar range of meanings. The aspect of conjunction has its own
> broad range of meanings. Put these 3 together and you have such a broad
> spectrum of possible meanings that, in my opinion, it is not possible to
> get any kind of indication for trading from it.
> That's all.
>
> David Cicia
>
> At 07:44 AM 4/26/98 -0600, R.Griess wrote:
> >David Cicia wrote:
> >
> >>What I'd like to see is specific correlations and precise indications,
> >>not subject to subjective interpetation.
> >
> >RT's,
> >
> >The above quote was used in a post about astrology. As I read it, I said
> >to myself: "Golly, the quest for the Holy Grail".
> >
> >While the quote itself was directed at astrology, could it not apply to
> >virtually every technical indicator, computerized system or even Delta
> >(since that has been a hot topic here recently)? The key phrase is
> >subjective interpretation!!
> >
> >I might interpret a stochastic one way and you another. Or, you might
> >interpret a RSI one way and I another. System trader XYZ might use a
> >system one way while system trader ABC might use the same system another
> >way. Norman might interpret the stars one way and Arch Crawford another.
> >SUBJECTIVE INTERPRETATION!!
> >
> >Is there such a thing as specific correlations that stand up??
> >
> >I don't pretend to have the answers......., but would welcome suggestions
> >as to where to look.
> >
> >Ron
> >
> >
> >
> >
|