[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GEN: All indicators lag, don't they?



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

At 06:36 PM 3/24/98 -0500, Paul Cote wrote:
>Momentum leads price
>
>Bill Eykyn wrote:
>> 
>> >
>> >Bill and RTs,
>> >I have heard of the term "leading indicators" before.
>> >So is there not such a thing?
>> >Could someone give me examples of "leading indicators" if they exist?
>> >And how they can be used?
>> >
>> >WilliamW
>> 
>> For me, the term "leading indicators" is a misnomer.   You will have
noticed
>> that none of the answers and follow-ups to my original post have come up
>> with an indicator that leads, rather than lags.  I do not believe that a
>> leading indicator exists.   Just think about it logically, if someone
had an
>> indicator which showed precisely where the market was headed, he or she
>> would be a millioniare and the indicator would never, ever be on the market
>> for the likes of you and me.
>> 
>> I am sure some indicators apparently point the way  (based on X number of
>> bars back), but whether the market is likely to continue even for one bar
>> more on that course, is pure conjecture.   In fact, it is probably worse
>> than a flip of the coin, because that says it goes up or it goes down and,
>> of course, most of the time it goes sideways...  and we ain't got a three
>> dimensional coin!
>> 
>> Price action indicates some;  Fibonacci retracements indicate some;  volume
>> indicates some;  and any other action that takes place right at the leading
>> edge, indicates some, but that vast array of so-called 'technical analysis'
>> indicators to be found in all the leading charting packages will just fool
>> some while they indicate none.
>> 
>> Face it, you just gotta learn to read the tape, like Larry Livermore did -
>> only you gotta computer...
>

Paul,

Volume leads price,

Pete
petena9090@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx