[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Fwd: Re: Define the best Mechanical system]



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

--- Begin Message ---
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Define the best Mechanical system
From: Gwenn Aël Gautier <gw.gautier@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 18:54:36 +0100
References: <19980116040351.AAA6032@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: gw.gautier@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

ALTAF JUMMA wrote:
> 
> Hi Rtrs,
> The reason I did not define what is the best in terms of mechanical system
> is to have individual trader viewpoint. For my own purpose, I would define
> it as a system which can be traded with $15000 and not more than 40%
> drawdown. But  each individual trader has different expectations from his
> trading system. I would prefer individual viewpoints.
> As I can see, there doesn't seem to be many mechanical system which work -
> correct me if I am wrong.
> Happy Trading Ashif


For me the best would be the one where you have the highest certainty to be 
ahead next week, next month, next year, ie the one with the smoothest equity 
line I suppose... I have yet to see such a thing though, you're never really 
sure, and it is never really easy. 

Everything has a cost, there is no free lunch. In my experience, either the 
system is easy to execute and you have to pay in time spent waiting or in 
higher, longer drawdowns, or lower or irregular returns. If it is to be better 
then that, with a smoother line, typically it is the average trade that will 
start getting really small, and then execution, costs and burnout become an 
issue...

No perfect world I am afraid!

Everyone has to find his/her comfort level chosing to balance the 
different aspects, getting one and giving in on another. 

Gwenn






--- End Message ---