|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Dear Myron,
The Savvy S&P system like most newer systems designed for day trading are based upon the high volatility we have recently seen in the market.They are destined to fail in aless volatile environment.Therefor to test drive a system one must look for a higher than average win to lose ratio above 75%
I found out who used and abandoned the system by asking the right questions.
I did not say there was no real time data ,I said there was insufficient data for me.
Ultra has a current real time success rate of 97% and is only available by fax.Thogh not around very long,it passes my criteria to take ona test spin for $500 for one month.
Mechanically yours,
John
------------------ Reply Separator --------------------
Originally From: "myron zolkewsky" <logan57907@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Mechanical Trading
Date: 01/20/98 10:55pm
Hello John, thanks for the reply. Glad to hear you at least evaluated S&P
Savvy. Are you familiar with Ellery Coleman? I was skeptical and seems
maybe rightfuly so.
Was there a reason he could not/would not give "real time data"?
How did you find those persons who actually used it? Did the vendor provide
them or was it from your own research?
I would appreciate your futher elaboration as to why/what lends your doubts.
Your comments would be appreciated.
Also, where can I learn more about the Ultra S&P as you mention in your
email? I would like to get further details on it. Do you use this yourself
consistantly and profitably now and in the past? What does it cost you to
use it? I am looking for a system that is credible. You may be a good
contact.
MZ
-----Original Message-----
From: John Cappello <jvc689@xxxxxxx>
To: myron zolkewsky <logan57907@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, January 20, 1998 8:42 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Mechanical Trading
>
>Dear Myron,
>I have checked into the S&P Savvy system.I believe it has merit but the
items that concern me are:
>1.Insufficient real time data.
>2.Discussions with some former users were not as I would have liked.
>I believe there are other systems more exciting to evaluate like the Ultra
S&P system which I have seen be 97% accurate.
>Mechanically youre,
>John
>
>
>
>------------------ Reply Separator --------------------
>Originally From: "myron zolkewsky" <logan57907@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: Re: Mechanical Trading
>Date: 01/19/98 10:19pm
>
>
>Thanks for your reply. The Ellery Coleman system is called S&P SAVVY, he
>offers what seems to be a credible track record, not a lot of hype, either.
>His phone number is (912) 922-9019. This guy can fax documentation and
>ideas of what he does. I am not connected with him in anyway, I am not
>trying to promote it, I am trying to find out if it actually works.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: John Cappello <jvc689@xxxxxxx>
>To: myron zolkewsky <logan57907@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; RealTraders Discussion
Group
><realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: Sunday, January 18, 1998 8:00 PM
>Subject: Re: Re: Mechanical Trading
>
>
>>
>>Dear Myron,
>I have not heard of the system.If you have further info that would lead me
>to believe it interesting,I will investigate.
>Mechanically yours,
>John
>>
>>
>>
>>------------------ Reply Separator --------------------
>>Originally From: "myron zolkewsky" <logan57907@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Subject: Re: Mechanical Trading
>>Date: 01/18/98 07:36pm
>>
>>
>>John, have you any information about a "system" offered by Ellery Coleman,
>>out of Georgia? Thanks.
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: John Cappello <jvc689@xxxxxxx>
>>To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Date: Sunday, January 18, 1998 9:43 AM
>>Subject: Mechanical Trading
>>
>>
>>>To mechanical & system traders:
>>I started trading commodities last year after I purchased several systems.
>I
>>was very profitable in 1997 and have started 1998 in a profitable mode. I
>am
>>always looking at new systems in an attempt to smoothe out my equity
curve.
>>The purpose of my post is to start a thread whereby those of you who trade
>a
>>mechanical system will share your results as I have previously shared mine
>>and am willing todo so again.
>>I look forward to hearing from any of you either on this forum or
>privately.
>>Mechanically yours, !
>>>!
>>> John
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
|