|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
scot billington wrote:
>
> Looking at the time and sales you posted, I think you should have been
> filled at 933.50 which was the low price before the first uptick. You
> won't have much of an arguement to get better than that.
>
prs,
I agree with Scot, You deserve 933.50 at the least, but they admit the
mistake was their fault so I would definitely push for more.
Realistically, how much is your business worth to them, that is how to
decide what to go for.
The x's are trades that were quoted and then pulled for some reason or
"busted" as if they never happened.
Eric
|