|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
In all fairness, I was referring to my experience with DL about 4 or 5 years
ago. I'm sure they've improved upon the software since then. You're
absolutely correct when you say it depends on how much effort the developer
is willing to put into it. I remember seeing an example where someone only
referenced the DLL. If the DLL didn't exist, the system didn't run. If you
bracket that line out, the code runs on any computer. Very weak.
Trey
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Fulks [mailto:omegalist@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 1:07 PM
To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Protecting intellectual property
I have used DL recently and it is much better than the discussion here would
lead you to believe.
There are several levels of security you can use depending upon how much
effort you are willing to put in to it.
It works well and the company provides good documentation and support so can
I can certainly recommend it.
(I am just a customer and have no commercial interest in the company.)
Bob Fulks
At 12:02 PM 10/6/2009, Gary Fritz wrote:
>I think there was more than that. I believe you had to have a DL "dongle"
or something similar? If you didn't have the dongle, the DL metacode would
return a value that caused your indicator to calculate the wrong values.
Not sure about that though.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.420 / Virus Database: 270.14.4/2417 - Release Date: 10/06/09
06:50:00
|