|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I think there was more than that. I believe you had to have a DL
"dongle" or something similar? If you didn't have the dongle, the DL
metacode would return a value that caused your indicator to calculate
the wrong values. Not sure about that though.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Protecting intellectual property
From: Trey Johnson <trey.johnson@xxxxxxxxx>
To: 'Gary Fritz' <fritz@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: 10/6/2009 9:42 AM
If I remember correctly it's pretty easy to decipher the meta-code by simply
creating an indicator, copy all the code over (if you can access it), and
then print the output to a chart. It seems more like a second layer
protection beyond the built in Trade Station password protection.
Trey
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Fritz [mailto:fritz@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 11:09 AM
To: Alex Matulich; omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Protecting intellectual property
Be aware that DL is basically just a way to obfuscate your code. I
haven't used it in years but as I recall you convert some of your system
logic into an internal metacode, and hide that inside your EL code.
It's probably harder than de-compiling object code, just because the bad
guys don't have experience de-compiling the DL metacode, but it's not
bulletproof.
Gary
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Protecting intellectual property
From: Alex Matulich <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: 10/5/2009 11:23 PM
What about Diamond Lock from Investment Engineering Corp.,
http://www.investlabs.com/ . It seems expensive but maybe worth it.
Thanks for the pointer. Yes, it may be worth it.
-Alex
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.420 / Virus Database: 270.14.4/2417 - Release Date: 10/06/09
06:50:00
|