[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Recognizing a series function based on how it's called. Possible?



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

It's apparent the most difficult systems trading issue is the multiple
timeframes.
Still is...always has been.

Ask any trading system developer....

Next to that:
Multiple symbols: portfolio trading/backtesting

Highest degree of difficulty:
Combination of multiple symbols and multiple timeframes.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Fulks [mailto:bobfulks@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 5:25 PM
> To: Joel Reymont
> Cc: Omega List
> Subject: Re: Recognizing a series function based on how it's
> called. Possible?
>
> All charting packages have the similar indicators and
> functions generally so there is no problem if you write them
> from scratch.
>
> But converting lines of code, initialization sequences,
> detailed functionality, etc., from the original even manually
> is clearly an infringement.
>
> I am not a lawyer but I do know that this is not a simple
> area. I do know that companies who do generate such competing
> software products take great pains to make sure that the
> staff they use in the development has not even seen the
> competitor's code to avoid any possible violations of
> intellectual property rights.
>
> Writing all that stuff from scratch and properly testing it
> would take a several man-years of effort if you were lucky...
>
> You can use TradeStation functions lots of ways:
>
>   Avg = Average(Close, Length);
>   Avg = Average(Close[10], Length);
>   Avg = Average(Close, Length)[10];
>   Avg = Average(Close data2, Length);
>   Avg = Average(Close, Length) data2;
>   ...
>
> You get the idea. Not real simple to duplicate without a lot
> of testing.
>
> Bob Fulks
>
>
>
> At 01:35 PM 5/29/2007, Joel Reymont wrote:
>
> >Would it change anything if I write them from scratch? I suspect the
> >copyright protects the functions from being used "as is". Functions
> >written in a completely different language that have the
> same purpose
> >are probably completely new creations, not even derivative work.
> >
> >Overall, I plan to duplicate the TS function library within the next
> >couple of weeks.
>
>