PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Check if the data for your futures has volume. If so, select some option in DS to do not send volume for futures.
Best regards,
Andrew Nazarov
RT Soft Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking for an answer? Have found a solution? Share it with all users!
RT Soft Support Forum: http://forum.traderssoft.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob R" <bobrabcd@xxxxxxx>
To: "omega-list" <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 12:17 AM
Subject: TS2k charting delay
> The configuration is highspeed DSL IB TWS/Dynastore/GS/TS200i on a P4 w/HT
> 3gig cpu 1 gig memory. Here's the problem. Data appears on a one tick ES
> chart in TS charting in a "bursting" mode. Today I made some visual
> comparisons between TS charting and a chart made with an IB add on called
> ZoneTrader from w.tradewithconfidence.com. The ZoneTrader tick charts run
> in a Java application off the IB API and appear to be insync with the quotes
> in IB TWS and the IB chart. The TS chart runs in an obvious burst mode where
> prices are not changing, then the plot suddenly plays catchup. There is no
> mistaking this delayed effect. On another machine with dual 866 PIII's and
> a second DSL line with esignal and TS2k a one tick ES chart was also opened.
> It too played the stall and catchup. I've suspected for years there was
> something amiss. Because of the difference in hardware configurations, and
> by elimination, it appears the source of the problem is the way TS charting
> gets data from the GS, or that TS charting can't handle fast data.
>
> I really don't want to give up years of work with ela and els so I am
> wondering if anyone who has seen this effect in TS2k and switched to TS8
> finds that it solves that delay/bursting problem. Also does anyone have
> comments about how Multicharts handles data with a high volume emini like
> the ES? http://www.tssupport.com/products/multicharts/ . Am trying to get a
> demo on that but no response yet.
>
> thanks for the feedback(either to the list or direct,
> Bob RA
|