|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Frank,
I would gladly discuss the merits of technology with you but we
should probably do it offline so as not to bore the others.
A couple of people suggested an interesting application. I'm very
eager to build a prototype but would like to run it by this list...
The idea is having a technology that could monitor 2 or more data
feeds, matching and confirming the accuracy of the data as well as
monitoring and reporting on excessive latency in either feed is an
example.
Also, I was told that IB has multiple points of entry into their
platform and if one of them fails the "proxy" that I am to build can
switch to a different entry point.
Is this a problem that's common to a lot of you?
How would you match and confirm the accuracy? We are talking about
matching ticks? This would require that the data feed providers in
question send you an exchange-provided time stamp with every tick,
right?
Thanks, Joel
On Jun 30, 2005, at 8:42 PM, Frank Fleisher wrote:
Hello Joel,
There has been a lot of "catch-up" in the realm of multi-threading,
networking, and clustering. Erlang would have made sense in the 90s,
but today I would stick with more standard and widely distributed
architectures like Microsoft's Remoting.
--
http://wagerlabs.com/uptick
|