PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
From: "Henri Amand" <h.amand@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 20:52:46 +0100
Yes... but i would think that at a company like Salomon Smith Barney
they could atleast have proven themselfs to be worth more than the
fundamental guy's.
Aren't fundamentals just old and accepted means of 'Technical
Analysis'?
What are considered as 'fundamentals' has changed over the years, the
fundamentals of the 1920s are no longer around, they were replaced by
newer concepts, which would show up as TA nowdays. I think it just
shows that a good TA for todays world requires more than the simple
math of yesterday.
|