|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
QUOTE not be an architecture like Amd. In fact most all Amd's have some
incompatibilities with WinXP SP2.
False; but then intc's have some incompatibilities
QUOTE; Got an applicable link for that, other than an unspecified source
from an
Amd sponsered tech link?
Gotta be a or an intel employee! from an UNSPECIFIED SOURCE; must be
CBS, call Dan Rather promise him some big bucks and he will say anything you
want him to.
QUOTE but the processor is gated 0%, where as Intc gate their processors
50% for
reliabilty and heat reduction.
wrong and complete bs THEY ALL WORK THE SAME The old standby If you can't
dazzle them with brillance then baffle them with bullshit!
So if you're low on funds and need power, its hard to beat. Many traders
like Amd.
another put down! But he is right it is hard to beat at any price!
quote I don't like the ddr crap either, but my dual Xeon RDRAM loaded
workstations
should do well for
years to come in performance and reliability. But personally, I'd get the
best Intc you could get.
no one cares what you like! since it is a known fact that tech speed doubles
every 18 months, the years to come attitude is unfortunate on your part or
maybe just stupid; we all have to upgrade our computers every year or two or
so.
QUOTE: The only way that would happen is if INTC comes out with 64 bit, but
it is
not needed, and it would
not be an architecture like Amd. In fact most all Amd's have some
incompatibilities with WinXP SP2.
Liar; 64 bit IS in beta, msft is going to move forward whether intc does, or
does not. 64 bit will be needed just like 16 bit 32 bit were and are needed
and amd is backwardly compatible. This crap you spew is getting old, too
many lies, go away!
The bottom line is no matter what; WE all have to keep upgrading our
computers whether we want to or not! This is a fact of life I doubt anyone
is still trading on a 486 or anything close to it. So drop the crap! I can
buy a really fast unit every year for about 600 bucks which is much cheaper
than the slower expensive stuff intel puts out.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Bailey" <baileyp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 4:49 PM
Subject: RE: OT- Dell Dimension, Celeron vs Pentium 4
> "Plus they are ready for windows 64 bit os which is in
> beta now."
>
> Got an applicable link for that, other than an unspecified source from an
> Amd sponsered tech link?
> The only way that would happen is if INTC comes out with 64 bit, but it is
> not needed, and it would
> not be an architecture like Amd. In fact most all Amd's have some
> incompatibilities with WinXP SP2.
>
> Basically you're buying old Athlon 32 bit technology from years back. It
is
> fast for its size,
> but the processor is gated 0%, where as Intc gate their processors 50% for
> reliabilty and heat reduction.
>
> So if you're low on funds and need power, its hard to beat. Many traders
> like Amd.
> I don't like the ddr crap either, but my dual Xeon RDRAM loaded
workstations
> should do well for
> years to come in performance and reliability. But personally, I'd get the
> best Intc you could get.
>
> But look very hard so you don't have to keep buying and upgrading
> frequently.
> Spend the time building the workstation versus replacing/upgrading. Its a
> bitch to do it right,
> but its even worse if you don't. Good luck.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: coaster [mailto:coaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 9:52 PM
> To: Romi Ghose; omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: OT- Dell Dimension, Celeron vs Pentium 4
>
>
> go to compusa auction site http://www.compusaauctions.com/ look for an
amd
> athlon 64 unit they normally have 160 gb hd and 512 of ram along with good
> video w 128 meg card, cd rw and dvd rw and digital card readers along with
5
> usb tv out 2 firewire ports and xp home. here is one up now!
>
http://www.compusaauctions.com/cgi-bin/ncommerce3/ProductDisplay?prrfnbr=558
> 94490&prmenbr=32764874&aunbr=56241200
>
> They go for about 500 and are as fast or faster than intc look for 1 with
a
> one year warranty if possible, slap in extra ram and your own os and save
a
> grand over a dell. Plus they are ready for windows 64 bit os which is in
> beta now.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Romi Ghose" <r.ghose@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 6:48 PM
> Subject: OT- Dell Dimension, Celeron vs Pentium 4
>
>
> > I currently use a 600MHz (P2 perhaps?!) with 1GB RAM, 18GB x 2 7200 RPM
> SCSI
> > drives, and four 32MB PCI graphic cards (each single display) . The OS
is
> > NT4 and I have never seen more than 300MB RAM utilized for what I do.
The
> > OS is corrupted but still working (phew!) and I am thinking of replacing
> > with a Dell Dimension 3000 that has Celeron D 320 (2.4 GHz, 533 FSB),
512
> MB
> > Dual Channel 400 MHz DDR SDRAM, 80 GB Ultra ATA/100 7200 RPM HardDrive
and
> > three Matrox G450 PCI (each dual display) cards. The OS will be NT4 and
> > will run run about 10 TS2Ki charts (with about five indicators in each
> > chart), in real time connected to eSignal (collecting 300 stock and
> indeces
> > data). Also will run a couple of eSignal advanced charts, T&S for one
> stock
> > at a time, a quote window of about 30 symbols and a news window. Will
the
> > Celeron be a drawback for all this or will it be at least similar to my
> > existing setup? Thanks in advance for any advice/feedback.
> >
>
>
> ---
>
---
|