|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
> Considering all the negatives with TS and WL3 that you have
> elucidated, can you share with us which program you use day to day
> for system testing that has overcome all your concerns? We all know
> no program is perfect, so dismissing a program because its not
> perfect is not something you would I imagine.
I use TS for most of my research. A lot of things about TS tick
me off, but I find it's the most productive environment for most
of what I want to do.
When I need to do something that TS can't do without excessive
kludging, usually portfolio-based testing, I often pick up WL.
Then I get so annoyed at it that I drop it until the next time I
have a portfolio question.
You asked Alex:
> are you actively working with current developers (on say the WL site
> or TS World) to resolve many of the missing or innacurate features?
I had some pretty extensive discussions with Dion (WL developer)
about the things I perceived as serious deficiencies in WLD2.1.
A few of those got fixed or improved in WLD3. Most things that
troubled me, though, Dion didn't see as a problem or didn't think
he could fix within the existing WL paradigm.
Gary
|