|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I think it's a shame that people are so down on someone who is contributing an idea that he thinks may be worthwhile. He never promised anyone anything, and no-one paid for it. I for one would rather see a lot more of postings like his than more requests for free data or more "how do I code simple moving average" questions.
Discuss the merits of the idea or ignore it, but please save your jaded sarcasms for an appropriate forum.
Thank you.
Ken Greenwood
-----Original Message-----
From: John Blucar [mailto:blucar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 8:22 PM
To: Mark Brown
Cc: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re[2]: New Method
Mr. Prosignals:
This negative dialogue is getting boring fast.
"If I did at all for you then you would not grow to become a strong and wise man, grasshopper".
Obviously a guy who can put together a website with columns of little paypal icons that charges $250 per month and more to spoon feed trade signals is intelligent enough to study months and years of charts and come up with his own assumptions to CONTRIBUTE to the overall list discussion, rather than relentlously prod and pry others to do it all for him.
Would you have felt better if I had just posted the idea behind a webpage with a little paypal icon that when clicked went straight to your order page --- how convenient ! Or maybe you'd feel better if all free ideas of merit that members want to post on the o list should be required to route through your order page first (Stalin couldn't have done it better) ? That way my idea as well as other o list members free ideas would not as easily compete with your obvious profit motives ?
I invite you spend 5 or 6 hours studying the charts and post some positive contributions to the concept.
But whether you choose to share your best future discoveries with the omega list members or steer them towards your lil Paypal icons - - - perhaps that's best left for all the list members to observe & judge.
Peace, love and groovy harmonics,
John
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 09:47:06 -0600 , Mark Brown <markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Hello John,
>
>JB> http://www.futuresmagic.com/A%20better%20Method.htm
>
>what is the INX symbol? is that the SP futures?
>
>on the top chart the divergence made two tops and on the bottom chart
>it made three tops, which do you wait for two, three or more? what are
>your risk parameters or do you just keep hoping it will come back?
>
>how many years back did you observe this and how many occurrences per
>year average do you think you saw this? how much money per occurrence
>do you think it made on that chart?
>
>can you detail a list of hard rules from 1 to 10 etc. so that i can
>build a mechanical system and test this idea? i'm sure i will be able
>to optimize the parameters and post some impressive results.
>
>
>
>--
>Thank You,
>Mark Brown
>www.markbrown.com
>
>
|