|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Yep, you are missing something.
1) I made no absolute claims, other than saying it appeared that lately it caught some nice moves (take it or leave it).
2) I said it still needed to be coded, by submitting it I was hoping to get the o-list interested and maybe some would code it and improve it.
3) My old high school chum Julia Roberts called me giggling, ask me to go cruising and then told me to submit it to the o-list.
It's just a new idea. But unlike others, I have always submitted performance summaries for any system where I had the code in hand and I will continue to do so.
Anything else ?
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:02:21 -0600 , John Blucar <blucar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Yep, you are missing something.
>
>1) I made no absolute claims, other than saying it appeared that lately it caught some nice moves (take it or leave it).
>
>2) I said it still needed to be coded, by submitting it I was hoping to get the o-list interested and maybe some would code it and improve it.
>
>It's just a new idea. But unlike others, I have always submitted performance summaries for any system where I had the code in hand and I will continue to do so.
>
>
>Anything else ?
>
>
>On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:22:48 -0800 , DH <catapult@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>John Blucar wrote:
>>> he should post decent believeable 4 year performance
>>> summaries on his better oddball systems
>>
>>John,
>>
>>Sorry, I don't see the code or the 4 year performance summaries for your
>>"better method" anywhere. Am I missing something?
>>
>>--
>> Dennis
|