[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Unidentified subject!



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Hi Jimmy and others who have interest in this thread,
FWIW I have been using a machine that has PS2Ki and eSignal real time
equities only (500) for a year and haven't faced any serious problem or
downtime yet.  Ocassionally (about 6 or 7 times) STVOL/$TVOLQ intraday got
messed up.  But other than that no other problems.  I do not deal with
futures or any other market (just US equities), so no input in those areas.
Can say its better than DTN internet and Quote.com...both product and
support wise.  Don't have experience with any other data feed.  Price is ok
for yearly subscription @ about USD 100.00/month plus they work with
existing clients during renewal.  However too high if you have to pay USD
200 on a monthly basis or when spcials are not running.
Romi

----- Original Message -----
From: Jimmy Snowden <jhsnowden@xxxxxxx>
To: <Omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 2:24 PM
Subject: Unidentified subject!


>
>
> Esignal has better bid/ask and trade volume than DTN satellite has and
> it seems to me it is very fast with price.  It looks faster to me than
> DTN Satellite but I'm not sure.  I'm only on the 30 day trial but if
> the prices are $.01 higher than DTN IQ then I'm gone.  I'll go DTN IQ
> or back to the satellite feed especially if we get some type of data
> download ability from DTN.  I don't know what a regional fee is.
> Neither do the other data vendors it seems.  If they don't get on the
> ball very fast DTN will blow them away if what Mark Brown says he is
> working on happens.  Cool!  Go Mark!
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>   Jimmy Snowden
> mailto:jhsnowden@xxxxxxx
>
>
> Friday, September 12, 2003, 1:09:06 PM, you wrote:
>
> MB> Hello Randolph,
>
> RH>> Whether Mark Brown is or is not making millions is completely
> RH>> irrelevant. It's all about fairness and good business practice.
>
> MB> Exactly and eSignal is not fair at all.
>
> RH>> At this point I could not agree more with Mark. I have
> RH>> unfortunately been paying the ridiculous Region Fee for some time,
> RH>> why? I don't know! I can access almost any region on the planet
> RH>> via the internet and not pay a region fee.
>
> MB> Chuck at eSignal just thinks he can slip this charge in and everyone
> MB> will just pay it.  He has had his way so far but it will not last I
> MB> guarantee you that they will have to drop the access fee.  They will
> MB> also have to increase the symbols that they give and they will have to
> MB> fix the lack of decimals on their futures and futures options quotes.
> MB> I have spoken on the subject and that is the way it will be or else,
> MB> they will only have stock traders using their data feed.
>
> RH>> I do know that I pay the monthly DBC subscription fee of $185.00
> RH>> that limits me to a whopping 500 symbols. If I want 500 more then
> RH>> zingo again...... What about getting the 2000+ symbols or so that
> RH>> I was use to???
>
> MB> Can you BELIEVE that you Only get 500 symbols and then to add insult
> MB> they charge you ACCESS fee?  WHAT NERVE CHUCK.
>
> RH>> I read Mark Brown's list contribution of today Sept. 03 and can
> RH>> only say Mark, Here, Here!........ You are Right On The Mark.
>
> MB> Thanks
>
> RH>> eSignal might not have there cake and eat it too for very long.
>
> MB> I am now back working with DTN on the DTN IQ and the Satellite feed to
> MB> bring TS users back some real good economical data feed choices yet
> MB> with the convenience of seamless historical data patching.  This will
> MB> be a significant step up from all current feeds for TS if this can be
> MB> accomplished.  I am committed to the project and I know that DTN is as
> MB> well and fully understands that the market is there if you treat
> MB> people fair and give them what the need and pay for.
>
>
>
>
> RH>> Regards
>
> RH>> Randolph M. Hoffman
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Outgoing mail scanned by Norton
>
> --
> Best regards,
>  Jimmy Snowden
> mailto:jhsnowden@xxxxxxx
>
> Outgoing mail scanned by Norton
>
>