[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Off Topic item regarding Calif recall and Arnold S.


  • To: "Jerry War" <drwar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Off Topic item regarding Calif recall and Arnold S.
  • From: "Eric Svendsen" <esvendsen@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 16:01:35 -0700

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Agreed.

Prop 13 saved alot of working class grandparents etc
from being taxed out of their homes.

Eventually the property is sold
and reassessed.

The CA population is aging.

ERic


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jerry War" <drwar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Daniel Martinez" <danm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 3:48 PM
Subject: Re: Off Topic item regarding Calif recall and Arnold S.


> Yes there is a descrepency. That was done on purpose. What if you are a
blue
> collar worker
> making 40K /year and you bought your house back in 1965 for 100k Your
> mortgage is paid off
> and you are about to retire but now because of inflated values its worth
> over 900k and there is no
> way you can afford the real estate taxes on a 900k house. Are you suppose
to
> be priced out of your
> own home you spent your life paying for by taxes. A purchaser of a new
900k
> home has the income
>  to afford the house and the higher taxes.
>
> Jerry
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Daniel Martinez" <danm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 6:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Off Topic item regarding Calif recall and Arnold S.
>
>
> > Buffet is right about property taxes being too low à la Prop. 13.  Prop.
> 13 also
> > favors longer term property owners vs. newer home buyers.  Buffet pays
7x
> more
> > in prop taxes for his home in Nebraska than in Calif even though the CA
> home is
> > worth 8x more:
> > http://www.tax-news.com/asp/story/story.asp?storyname=13018
> >
> > Prop 13 was never fair because newer home buyers paying $600,000 for a
> single
> > story home in Los Angeles, yes that's $600K, will be taxes for the full
> value of
> > the home.  In Newport Beach, homes worth $2 Million are assessed for far
> less
> > because the owners have been there for years.
> >
> > Daniel Martinez.
> >
> > BobR wrote:
> >
> > > Must be that Warren owns some California bonds or is going to buy some
> and
> > > like with private companies he is going to make sure the investment
pays
> off
> > > by taking an active roll in the management.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "John Armstrong" <mrktwiz1@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 12:09 PM
> > > Subject: Off Topic item regarding Calif recall and Arnold S.
> > >
> > > > Warren Buffet has just agreed to be Arnold
> > > > Schwarzenegger's Economic Advisor...developing....WOW!
> > > >
> > > > John Armstrong
> >
>