Re: New eSignal ActiveX plug-in for TS2000i

["BobR" <bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This is sounding better.  Let me re-ask part of the question again.  Since
indexes don't have a bid/ask, and if you enter it as ES #F and if you Edit
the GS Symbol History to Save and Add Bid Record and Ask Record does the GS
infact save the Bid and Ask information?  Such information is needed to
create the Activity Bars.  And just to be clear, does entering it as ES #F
save trade volume?

thanks again,
bobr

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jerry War" <drwar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; "BobR" <bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: New eSignal ActiveX plug-in for TS2000i


> One way is to set up the contract as an index. Especially with Esignal you
> can set up there emini
> continuous contract (ES #F ) as an index symbol in GS and you will not
have
> the cpu problem nor will
> you have to change symbols during rollover for any of the emini's
>
> Jerry
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "BobR" <bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <Omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 7:05 PM
> Subject: Re: New eSignal ActiveX plug-in for TS2000i
>
>
> >
> > Is the only problem with TS2k and esignal the one related to emini trade
> > volume when they are assigned to the Futures filter in the GS?  Is that
> the
> > problem that drives the cpu useage up the wall?  There have been posts
on
> > assigning them to an index or stock filter to avoid this problem.  What
> > exactly is the best way to handle this?  Is it the same for ES and NQ as
> it
> > is for the YM?  Can you get the emini Bid and Ask and Trade volume into
> the
> > GS when using TS2k and esignal?
> >
> > thanks,
> > bobr
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Cayenne Trading LLC" <cayenne@xxxxxxxx>
> > To: "Jimmy Snowden" <jhsnowden@xxxxxxx>; <Omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 3:48 PM
> > Subject: Re: New eSignal ActiveX plug-in for TS2000i
> >
> >
> > > Jimmy:
> > >
> > >     eSignal has always worked with TS2K. I believe the DynaStore
> solution
> > > was meant for users of TS 4.0. I remember a tremendous amount of
> > resistance
> > > from TS users to avoid the upgrade to TS2K
> > >
> > > Jim
> > >
> >
>