|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
If TS7 isn't usable a lot sooner than a year from now, the company could be
in deep trouble, which explains why they are trying hard to fix the
problems.
Their evident lack of basic QA practices such as standard test suites,
regression testing, etc., makes things take longer and wastes time and
energy of both TS staff and users.
I notice from TS World that 7.1, released a few days ago, has major
problems, which would have been caught with decent QA procedures.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jimmy Snowden [mailto:jimmy@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 11:53 AM
> To: Omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx; Michael Tepper
> Subject: Re[4]: TS 4 versus current version
>
>
> Michael,
>
> Bottom line is TS7 is just not ready for prime time. Give it a year
> if it still exists then look again. If code size is a problem then
> use TS2ki. At least it has defined bugs that you can get help with.
>
>
> Jimmy Snowden
>
> Monday, May 12, 2003, 10:43:46 AM, you wrote:
>
> Michael> OK, I get some of your answer.
>
> Michael> 1) My current code will not work the same under new TS 7.0.
>
> Michael> 2) I'd have to change code to get them to run under TS 7.
>
> Michael> I agree this is not desirable.
>
> Michael> Some Questions:
>
> Michael> 1) How extensive a modification to TS 4.0 systems is
> required to run under
> Michael> TS 7.0?
>
> Michael> 2) Are there benefits, from a system design perspective,
> to TS 7.0?
>
> Michael> Thanks,
> Michael> Michael
>
> Michael> ----- Original Message -----
> Michael> From: "Jimmy Snowden" <jhsnowden@xxxxxxx>
> Michael> To: <Omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; "Michael Tepper"
> <miketep@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Michael> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 11:26 AM
> Michael> Subject: Re[2]: TS 4 versus current version
>
>
> >> Michael,
> >>
> >> Perhaps you haven't been reading the posts on this list. This is
> >> helpful. I bet none of your system work the same if you change to
> >> TS7. Plus you will have to change your code to just get them to run.
> >> Also think about the history of Tradestation/Omega products. What
> >> happens every single time they come with a new program? Which
> >> program so far is the most complete? Do you think it might be TS4?
> >> Did I beta test TS6? Do I use it? Would I even think of using TS7?
> >>
> >> Do you want me to answer all these questions?
> >>
> >> Sincerely,
> >>
> >> Jimmy
> >>
> >> Monday, May 12, 2003, 10:04:58 AM, you wrote:
> >>
> >> MT> Hi Jimmy,
> >>
> >> MT> I am sure your trying to be helpful...but your answer gives me no
> >> MT> information.
> >>
> >> MT> Look at it from my point of view...what does your answer
> mean? TS 7
> Michael> will
> >> MT> kill my systems? If so, how? What is the problem? Which
> version do
> Michael> you
> >> MT> use?
> >>
> >> MT> Thanks,
> >> MT> Michael
> >>
> >> MT> ----- Original Message -----
> >> MT> From: "Jimmy Snowden" <jimmy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> MT> To: <Omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; "Michael Tepper" <miketep@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> MT> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 10:58 AM
> >> MT> Subject: Re: TS 4 versus current version
> >>
> >>
> >> >> Michael,
> >> >>
> >> >> May your systems RIP.
> >> >>
> >> >> Jimmy Snowden
> >> >>
> >> >> Monday, May 12, 2003, 9:52:34 AM, you wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Michael> I have TS 4.0. I use it solely for system design. I am
> >> MT> considering moving
> >> >> Michael> to the latest TS version (7), for the same purpose: system
> >> MT> design.
> >> >>
> >> >> Michael> Any comments, comparisons, suggestions, warnings etc.?
> >> >>
> >> >> Michael> Thanks,
> >> >> Michael> Michael
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best regards,
> >> Jimmy Snowden mailto:@aledobb.com
> >>
> >>
>
|