[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2000i and Dual Processor



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Hi HC,

You have been polite even though you have doubts about my endeavours. I wish
everybody can conduct themselves with maturity and respect like what you
did.

I have a few techniques which gives very good signals. To the best of my
memory, I dont remember these techniques had any losing trades over the past
few years. Too good to be true? I know. However these techniques only give a
few signals a year, some time it dont, some time I miss it. I used to do it
manually over 100 stocks every day. So you can imagine how tiring it is.

So now I am planning to automate it, and test it over 1000 stocks first. And
watch its real time performance over one year period with Radar Screen.

Regards,
Long

----- Original Message -----
From: "hcarvas" <hcarvas@xxxxxxx>
To: "Long Chuanren" <longchuanren@xxxxxxxxx>; <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, 19 April, 2003 1:37 AM
Subject: RE: 2000i and Dual Processor


> Long,
>
> I see that you try to track 1200 stocks.  I admire your ability to do so.
>
> If you are running a trading service or a mutual fund, I can see the
> purpose.
> However, if you are trading for a living.  You may need to ask youself
this
> question is: for what?
>
> I used to do that with RadarScreen. It created nothing for me but computer
> crash, headache,
> confusion and losses. Then I narrowed it to 300.   Then I narrowed it down
> to 20.
> Lately, I found on my most profitable days, I am only tracking 3-6 stocks
> real time. The rest if EOD.
>
> Even the most famous Jesse Livermore could not handle more than a few
stocks
> at a time
> (maybe he did not have TradeStation 8 and triple processors).  What make
me
> think that I would be
> more profitable doing otherwise?
>
> Regards,
>
> hc
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Long Chuanren [mailto:longchuanren@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 10:02 PM
> To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: 2000i and Dual Processor
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I read a complain about TS7 with a dual AMD system.
>
> Now I am thinking of using Dell workstation 450, dual processor capable,
to
> do some of my work. Tracking about 1200 stocks in real time with Radar
> Screen.
>
> Can we have some feedback from people with experience in using 2000i
running
> on a dual processors? Is it necessary to have a 15,000 rpm SCSI hard
drive?
> How much Ram? Will XP hit 100% CPU usage? Which OS is more stable?
>
> Have a good weekend!
> Long
>