|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Not sure why that would be an issue, if the max # of symbols limit (ie, 50,
100 or 500) is still maintained. BTW, Metastock real-time for eSignal or
Quote.com does allow LAN installation with the restriction that a second
simultaneous access will kill the first access. In this config, you can
have eSignal or Quote.com on one machine connected to the Internet and have
Metastock connect to it from another machine on the LAN.
Moreover, eSignal does offer TurboFeed that is networkable...costs
$500/month for 1000 symbols and a mandatory one time fee of $1500 that
includes the API.
Again, not an expert on exchange fee issues...
Romi
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jerry War" <drwar@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Romi Ghose" <r.ghose@xxxxxxxxx>; <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "wireless wireless" <wirelessquotes@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: eSignal on a LAN
> This is an exchange fee issue.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Romi Ghose" <r.ghose@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "wireless wireless" <wirelessquotes@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 5:04 PM
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: eSignal on a LAN
>
>
> > Hi Roger and Indextrader,
> > I had checked with Andrew at Traders-Soft and his response was:
> > ============================
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Traders Soft" <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "Romi Ghose" <r.ghose@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 12:17 PM
> > Subject: Re: TS Net Utility
> > > Hello!
> > > If you want to share eSignal's subscription, so it is not possible
> either
> > TS net nor MetaServer.
> > > Andrew
> > ============================
> > But please let me know if you guys have been successful in establishing
> more
> > than one real time access simultaneously.
> >
> > Yes, I agree such a product would be valuable but at the same time would
> > understand if eSignal would not encourage it as it would affect their
> > revenue. Maybe Chuck will consider offering his users, at least two
> > simultaneous access with one account. I am not a IP or network guru but
> > here's something Chuck may wanna visit with his tech folks:
> > 1) Is it possible to allow no more than two simultaneous active
> connections
> > to one DataManager account on a LAN, not allowing such connections via
any
> > hop (i.e., the Internet) or VPN?
> > Again I am not his VP of business development, but here's something
Chuck
> > may wanna think over: eSignal already enjoys an excellent reputation
and
> > will adding such a feature actually disrupt or enhance his market share
in
> > the individual traders community? Again not sure...but if it helps, he
> may
> > not allow this feature to professional or business accounts who are
> already
> > offered with a networkable professional TurboFeed product suitable for
> their
> > business needs.
> > So Chuck, what do you think?!...Is there a big potential for individual
> > traders to concentrate more making $25-50 per month by sharing their
> second
> > access that would involve having the second user to be physically
present
> at
> > the LAN location (since access is not available via hop or VPN) for
least
> > 61/2 hours M-F (keeping in mind that most individual traders trade from
> > home..so working space and PC for the second user...giving up privacy of
> > one's home), rather than concentrate in their own trading ...or
> > Is there a big potential for eSignal to retain and even enhance its
market
> > share with such a necessary feature???
> > Just a friendly suggestion.
> > Take care,
> > Romi
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "IndexTrader" <indextrader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 3:25 PM
> > Subject: Re: Re[2]: eSignal on a LAN
> >
> >
> > > They've got some "TS Net Utility" thing that sound as if it may work
> > > but...no documentation and its a "demo"?
> > >
> > > Sure would be worth $200-$300 if somebody came up with a way to share
> > these
> > > data feeds in your personal lan.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Roger Shepherd" <mailrs@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: "Romi Ghose" <r.ghose@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 12:06 PM
> > > Subject: Re[2]: eSignal on a LAN
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hello Romi,
> > > >
> > > > Sunday, December 8, 2002, 12:57:08 PM, you wrote:
> > > >
> > > > RG> Hi Chuck,
> > > > RG> It's great that you responded on this forum to JA's question.
> > > Demonstrates
> > > > RG> your open mind to the needs of traders!
> > > > RG> Regarding your response, "You can run eSignal on a LAN.", even
if
> it
> > > is
> > > > RG> restricted to one active access/connection to the Data Manager,
> are
> > > you
> > > > RG> saying it is possible to install eSignal on one PC on the LAN
and
> > > access it
> > > > RG> with third party software (like, InvestorR/T, NeoTicker,
PS2Ki...)
> > or
> > > even
> > > > RG> for that matter eSignal's charting software, from ANOTHER PC ON
> THE
> > > SAME
> > > > RG> LAN? If yes, where can we get more information on this...if
> there's
> > > any
> > > > RG> specific setup or installation involved?
> > > > RG> Once again thanks for your response.
> > > > RG> Romi
> > > >
> > > > RG> ----- Original Message -----
> > > > RG> From: "wireless wireless" <wirelessquotes@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > RG> To: <KungFuTrader@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > RG> Cc: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > RG> Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 12:48 PM
> > > > RG> Subject: eSignal on a LAN
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> JA,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> You can run eSignal on a LAN. I do it all the time.
> > > > >> You can also run eSignal on multiple computers with a
> > > > >> single account, but only one active at a time.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Same with TS6 I think,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Chuck
> > > > >> @eSignal
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > I am not a user of this product and
> > > > I have not done this myself but I believe MetaServer RT which is
sold
> > > > by http://www.traders-soft.com/ might do what you want.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Roger mailto:mailrs@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
|