PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
> Sorry, not for sale.
PO, you're not selling anything here?????
You are here from kindness and generosity??????
Geeez, you ARE a sick puppy if you believe that.
> Do we go advertise TS and critic WL in your WL forum ?
>
> No.
Keep in mind this is the Omega list, not Omega's list...
TSS abandoned the list and "Omega" products long ago.
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:04:57 +0100
"Pierre Orphelin" <sirtrade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : VK [mailto:vk@xxxxxxxxx]
> > Envoyé : lundi 18 novembre 2002 10:31
> > À : sirtrade@xxxxxxxxxx; omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Objet : AW: Replacement for 2000i
> >
> >
> > Pierre.
> >
> > I was expecting your very objective comments earlier and find my
> > subjective comments below yours.....
>
> Grumpf...
>
> >
> >
> > [VK>>]
> > I want nobody to quit TS, most people use both. But if I would start
> > into this business I want to be informed and if somebody is asking for
> > replacement it is the right for anyone who offers alternatives to speak
> > out. Just as you were quick to recommend TS6.
> >
>
> Commercial hypocrisis at its best....
>
> >
> > [VK>>]
> > You keep on talking about the web site. You did that month ago. When do
> > YOU understand that there is a software that one can install on the
> > desktop. I have some advantage over you, I used TS, MetaStock, Behold!,
> > Excalibur, BackTrak, ..... you have never used WLD2 which is ok but
> > gives you a disadvantage.
> >
>
> This means that you have been wrong (let me count) at least 5 times...
>
> >
> > [VK>>]
> > You are right the language is more complicated then EL at the moment.
> > But what do you say if we introduce drag and drop system development in
> > our next version?
>
> WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF!!!!!
> Drag and drop systeme development ?
> Are you trying to sell it at DisneyWorld ?
>
> >
> >
> > [VK>>]
> > Talking about true debugging, this will be introduced too and with the
> > new version comes a new handbook that has many more functions disclosed.
>
> Coming soon, as usual...
>
> >
> >
> >
> > [VK>>]
> > It seems that EL is you only argument for TS? So would you then say if a
> > software has a drag and drop programming possibility for simple system
> > creation (like TS has with EL) then WLD2 is a real competitor?
>
> HIHIHIHIHI!
> I see that you are really focusing to high end users!
> TS will probably not (fortunately) compete... Will it have drag and drop
> debugging too ?
>
>
> >
> > [VK>>]
> > See above, like to hear you comment then.
>
> I'm sorry, I have too much laughed for today...
>
> >
> >
> > [VK>>]
> > Why do you say weak platform? It is not only portfolio optimisation but
> > also portfolio level backtesting with portfolio level money management
> > rules applicable on it.
>
> Well, nice.
> Please stay away with all your overfitting tools, thanks.
>
> >
> > [VK>>]
> > Again the LANGUAGE. See above and is it the ONLY advantage of TS???
>
> It is the main advantage, yes.
> And more, it does not support drag and drop programming.
> Well we know that you are not a programmer, so I may understand that you are
> astonished by such nifty features.
>
> >
> > [VK>>]
> > Thanks for inviting everybody over just imagine I would have done it.
> > Please point them also to the over 500 systems published by the
> > community as a base for discussion. I remember how difficult it is/was
> > to get sample codes or lets take the open of tomorrow or the open in 10
> > days (some people charge money for that).
> >
>
> Should you publish 100,000 trading systems...
>
> Open in 10 days?....Yes, I see:
>
> If open of 10 days ahead> close then buy tomorrow at market;
> If success= true then buy a Disney World ticket and one big ice cream +
> chocolate non stop;
> else
> buy one small ice cream at market;
> end;
>
>
> >
> > FYI, so called WL advantages are feasible with TS. For example, walk
> > forward
> > optimisation that I use since 1993. Portfolio optimisation is feasible
> > too,
> > using even some public domain tools, not to speak of the Rina things. So
> > excepted some nifty 3D graphics (also available with external tools),
> >
> > [VK>>]
> > Like the once that one can buy from you?
> ===
> Sorry, not for sale.
> Mine works.
>
> Thanks for giving me the
> > opportunity again in letting everyone know (and you said it yourself)
> > that ALL this is included in WL. So no more add ons, RINAs at least for
> > the obvious things.
> ===
> Never said that WL is of no interest.
> I aside do not like the bad designed language, the aggressive commercial
> behaviour and the systematic TS aggression.
>
> Do we go advertise TS and critic WL in your WL forum ?
>
> No.
>
> So what are you doing here?
>
> May I conclude that your mother forgot to teach you some elementary social
> concepts ?
>
> >
> > [VK>>]
> > I am getting bored that you talk about the programming language again.
> > TS has one advantage, that is that EL is widely excepted. If I would
> > start today learning to program I would go for WealthScript. Why,
> > because it is just as easy if you start out with it and it gives you
> > more power.
> >
>
> This is where you fail to understand, because you cannot understand
> You cannot develop sophisticated systems with WL script unless having a medical
> assistance.
> Suffice to see the programming examples provided on the WL site.
> They are true nightmares.
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Pierre Orphelin
> www.sirtrade.com
> Tradestation 2000i, TradeStation 6 sales and support
> Safir-X, neurofuzzy logic trading system builder
>
> To subscribe to our FREE trading system newsletter:
> http://www.sirtrade.com/newsletter.htm
> Next issue: November 2002
>
>
>
>
|