|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Yea,
Just $7000 and you will have XPO SDK! Very great way to satisfy your customers:)
Sorry. it is the joke.
I don't recommend you, Dave, to think about XPO or OMZ supporting. You will spend about year of work to make XPO files be correct
(jusy take as example the Dynaloader of our competitor, though they spent year, they still can not make correct daily XPO file and
the tick data processing is so slow that they recommend to users use OMZ format as output). If you want to satifate you customers
offer then discounts for HistoryCentre:)
Best regards,
Andrew Nazarov
P.S. I like your QCollector, really:)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave DeLuca" <ddeluca@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Omega List" <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 11:15 PM
Subject: Re: Ascii to xpo converter
> From: "Mark Brown" <markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Hello sptrader,
> >
> > s> For those that haven't heard about Historycentre, it is software
> that will
> >
> > i think this is great cause the more people who own it "i do" the
> > better. why? because it has to be the most archaic hard to use
> > software i have ever seen in my life. yes it works, perfect "IF" you
> > have every setting perfect. well you may say "so what" how hard can
> > it be to get every setting perfect? damm near impossible.
>
> I've had many requests to add a feature to our program QCollector that
> would support saving data to .xpo/.omz format . Unfortunately the .xpo
> and .omz file format specifications aren't easy to come by. If anybody
> has these and wouldn't mind sharing please email me and I'd be happy to
> take a look at what how much work would be involved. This would give
> people another software option for filling in data.
>
> Dave DeLuca
> Tradeworks Software
> Email: tradeworks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Web: http://www.mechtrading.com
>
> >
> > maybe if more people support it by buying it the developer will
> > continue to improve upon it, i sincerely hope so cause it is a good
> > product but pure hell to use.
> >
> > i much prefer their qloader program which is easy to use and does
> > the same thing however it will only convert data downloaded on the fly
> > from quote.com which requires a qcharts.com subscription. but in my
> > opinion the cost of the quote.com subscription is well worth avoiding
> > have to use historycenter..
> >
> > s> Thank you
> >
> > no no thank you
> >
> > --
> >
> > Have a Great Day, Mark
> >
> > http://www.markbrown.com
> >
>
>
|