|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I was supposed to try out WL a few month ago but I didn't have the time to
do that back then but I will probably have another go at it during this or
next month. I remember that someone wrote that WL was better for testing
systems on stocks than on futures, do you agree with that?
/Stefan Johansson
----------------------------------------------------------
Stefan Johansson
President, CTA
Bors Analys AB
BA International Futures Fund, L.L.C.
http://www.baiff.com
stefan.johansson@xxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: "Josep Codina" <jcodina@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 7:02 PM
Subject: RV: Wealth Lab 2,Impressive
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Josep Codina [mailto:jcodina@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Enviado el: martes, 18 de junio de 2002 19:01
> Para: Ernie Bonugli
> Asunto: RE: Wealth Lab 2,Impressive
>
>
> Hello Ernie
> Yes I'm going to change to WL. i've testing it during last month and its
> woorks well. They are very oriented to the customer and very fast to
respond
> any doubts and opened to do a new implementations to make teh software
> better.
>
> I think that this software is better than TS for developemet systems. I'm
in
> europe and TS in europe have less solutions to datafeed than WL.
>
> Jospe Codina
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Ernie Bonugli [mailto:ebonugli@xxxxxxxx]
> Enviado el: martes, 18 de junio de 2002 18:38
> Para: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Asunto: Wealth Lab 2,Impressive
>
>
> list,
>
> Has anyone transitioned over to WL? Or is anyone seriously
> considering it? Their last release(s) looks impressive on
> the surface.
>
> One remaining issue on my list, is that the # of lines
> required to code an idea looks bulky to me. I really
> haven't studied the product, but do they support user written
> functions?
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Ernie
> ebonugli@xxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>
|