|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I did run the sample system and got it to run similar to the specification
(excel sheet) that was included.
At first I didn't see the "data2 $ADV" note and was running it on data1
(stupid me).
On data1 it runs poorly and that made me wonder if it is a "$ADV special" or
a generic auto adjusted MA.
For two reasons I did not do much testing with it.
One reason being lack of time but the other reason is that I don't know
where this will lead.
What are Mark's intentions with this AAMA?
Is it for demo only? for co-testing? for sale?
What to do with yet an other black box?
My guess is that MB just wanted some people to co-test the value of this
AAMA (which if fine by itself).
The code is well protected and also limited by date/password. Hence anything
I would do with it would be a waste of time since it would stop working the
next month.
While I would gladly run it with other type's of MA's for a testspin, I know
other people already did this.
Just some thoughts,
Robert
----- Original Message -----
From: "LaciG" <lacig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; "Mark Brown" <markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:23 AM
Subject: MB's AAMA vs OddBall, any comments?
> First off we should thank Mark for contributing OddBall and AAMA. If
> nothing else it made me think
> in new ways in systems (mechanical) trading.
>
> I am surprised that since MB contributed his AAMA there's been no
> discussion of it.
> Are there no reactions at all? Is it going on somewhere else besides
> this list?
>
> So far, from what I could see (with limited amount of data) OddBall is
> the more profitable one.
> Am I right, or am I doing something wrong?
>
> Any reactions from anyone???????????
>
>
>
>
|