|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hallo.
Just for your information, I had TS2000i running on Win2000 with a couple of
trading systems on a few markets and I only had to restart the computer 2 or
3 times in over a year... and I am not sure whos falt it was (data, TS,
power, or even mine :-)....). But I had nothing else on it, just TS2000i. I
surely drew some trend lines every now and then... which never got it
crashed.
Volker Knapp
Wealth-Lab Inc.
http://www.wealth-lab.com
http://www.wealth-lab.de
++-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
++Von: BobR [mailto:bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
++Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. März 2002 05:22
++An: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
++Betreff: Re: Re[2]: Windows 2000 v's NT4.0 SP 5 for 2000i
++
++
++Yes, I draw trendlines in realtime time with no crashes....on a
++dual PIII
++600mhz, Tyan S1834 motherboard W2k OS. TS runs quite well .
++Can't say as
++I've ever had a crash drawing/adjusting a trendline. I am not
++going to try
++it on Monday, now because it will be guaranteed to crash after that
++statement.
++
++bobr
++
++----- Original Message -----
++From: "Zoran Gayer" <elliottwave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
++To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
++Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 8:13 PM
++Subject: RE: Re[2]: Windows 2000 v's NT4.0 SP 5 for 2000i
++
++
++> There is such a diverse opinion on 2000i and operating on this or that
++> platform and operating system.
++>
++> I suspect the problem is on how it is used and what is used.
++On a moving
++> average it may have no problem at all. It will work real time with
++> absolutely no problems.
++>
++> But if you want to adjust a trend line while real time data
++is flowing,
++> it falls over on any OS or computer you may chose.
++>
++> What we need is a specific action that 2000i fails to do otherwise we
++> are comparing oranges and lemons. All judgments must be based on a
++> standard.
++>
++> Is there anybody that can draw a TRENDLINE IN REAL TIME and keep
++> adjusting it without 2000i crashing? I suspect the answer is no.
++>
++> Zoran
++>
++>
++>
++> -----Original Message-----
++> From: Simon Dawson [mailto:si@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
++> Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2002 8:52 AM
++> To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
++> Subject: Re: Re[2]: Windows 2000 v's NT4.0 SP 5 for 2000i
++>
++>
++> >[snip]
++> >weird behavior, and other glitches. The people with good experiences
++> >say they installed it on a fresh Win2k or sometimes even on Win98 and
++> >everything is fine. The people with problems usually say they've
++> >installed it on a fresh Win2k too.
++> >
++> >Those of you who have solid TS2k's, any idea HOW you did it? I'm
++> >sure there are a lot of people who'd love to know.
++>
++> Well, I've reinstalled TS2k on Win2k more times than I want
++to remember
++> over the last year, and I'd say in general, the MOST
++important thing is
++> to keep to an absolute minimum what you install on your machine.
++>
++> Every added app is something else that can screw up your stability..
++> particularly oddball (no offence mb) 3rd party apps; internet
++speeders,
++> downloader tools, virus checkers, firewalls etc etc. Only install what
++> you
++> -really- need.
++>
++> Also, get the latest drivers of everything (screen, sound, network,
++> etc),
++> and once it's all working, do NOT muck with it.
++>
++> I've had machines that went from stable to unusable simply because I
++> mucked about with changing screen sizes etc. Some of these 3rd party
++> drivers are VERY badly written. If it works, and its stable, for your
++> own
++> sanity, leave it -well- alone :)
++>
++> Now, things are pretty good, but it took me a few goes (and lots of
++> pain). I have an absolute minimum of apps, I don't touch the drivers,
++> and I'm happy. Everything else goes on a different machine. It's worth
++> forking out for another machine just for personal sanity..
++>
++> Si
++>
++
|