[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Poltergeists in TS4



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Hello Gary,

purely a guess--sort of like checking to see if your "broken" VCR is
plugged in--check to be sure you're using the same expiration month.

-- 
Best regards,
 Jim Johnson                           mailto:jejohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Monday, March 11, 2002, 1:26:54 PM, you wrote:

GF> Has anybody seen behavior like this before?

GF> My partner and I are running the same systems on parallel TS4's.  
GF> Both are running Quote.com data.  We sometimes get minor data 
GF> differences but no big deal.

GF> Recently, including twice this morning, his TS4 has acted weird.  In 
GF> one case it failed to register a signal I got.  When he re-applied 
GF> the same system to the same chart with the same parameters, it got 
GF> the signal correctly.  

GF> In another case he got a signal when I did but the price was wrong.  
GF> The system computed a sell price by subtracting a value (8.0) from 
GF> the Low of the current bar.  The Low of the bar on his TS4 AND mine 
GF> was 1532.1.  His TS4 signalled a sell price of 1525.7!?  1525.7 + 8.0 
GF> = 1533.7, and he didn't have ANY bars that had a Low of 1533.7.  
GF> Knowing the code, I can't see any way it could have computed that 
GF> value, though I wasn't at his TS so it's possible I missed something. 
GF>  But then he re-applied the same system on the same chart, and it 
GF> calculated the correct stop price of 1532.1-8.0 = 1524.1.

GF> This is NOT a case of "bouncing ticks" changing signals between 
GF> realtime and historic charts, or anything like that.  These systems 
GF> behaved patently wrong in realtime, and we could see it.  We checked 
GF> all the parameters and verified they were set up right.  Then they 
GF> worked right when we re-applied them.

GF> Any guesses???
GF> Thanks,
GF> Gary