|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hi Alex,
the comparison was only to find out weather they found a good way, if so we
could use this method for improving WLD2.
But for the piece of all I really think I/we will stop here. We will improve
this feature and I will contact those involved on a private basis after we
got this feature into WLD2.
As to CJ Macintosh, knowing that he is working at the moment to get some
prove behind his statement, we should give him some time. But I will remind
him from time to time. Why do I speak in third person?? Because he has not
been on the list ever since, so I wait and take it like
.... forgive them (him); for they know not ....
Volker Knapp
Wealth-Lab Inc.
http://www.wealth-lab.com
http://www.wealth-lab.de
++-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
++Von: Alex Matulich [mailto:alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
++Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2002 23:33
++An: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
++Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Wealth Lab - was - Wealth Crap
++
++
++Volker:
++
++>I dont see any difference between the way WLD2 is handling futures and
++>TS2000i was/is using futures. I am not able to comment on the
++new TS6. Maybe
++>they found a better way there.
++>
++>So how do you set the point value with TS2000i?
++
++TS2000i does it for you. If you go to "Format Symbol" there's a tab
++that has a "Universe" button. If you click on that and enter your
++root symbol there and click "Find" then the symbol is found for you
++along with all the other characteristics like point value.
++
++I must make another point: Don't compare yourself to TS2000i
++and think that's good enough. You can do BETTER. That's why I
++suggested more things in the database that are user-configurable,
++like margin requirements for each symbol. Especially if WL does
++portfolio analysis (which TS cannot do), you need an easy way
++(i.e. a database) to distinguish the different futures contract
++characteristics, so that the program will work properly.
++
++-Alex
++
|