|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hm. Just one thing to think about: To trade you need an edge. Are you
more likely to get that edge with the same tool set as the majority of
traders or with a tools set only a few are using ?
Just my $.02 worth ;-)
At 09:39 31/01/02 -0500, M. Simms wrote:
>repeat after me:
>VB is not a trading platform.
>VB is not a trading platform.
>VB is not a trading platform.
>VB is not a trading platform.
>VB is not a trading platform.
>VB is not a trading platform.
>VB is not a trading platform.
>
>Anyone want to build a house out of logs and an axe ?
>It'll look real good next to that custom-built stone mansion.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: RUSS FURSE [mailto:rfurse@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:50 PM
> > To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: EasyLanguage protected by copyright ?
> >
> >
> > I agree with you comments; however, why not use Visual Basic code?
> > Most people could learn to use this as easily as EL and VB would
> > enable much greater flexability and links to other software. In
> > addition, there is a lot of VB documentation, code examples and
> > training manuals available. The great programmers on this list could
> > code all of the indicators and systems that come with TradeStation
> > and a lot of other sample code to get beginners to VB started. If
> > not VB, some other language that is as universally accepted with tons
> > of training and documentaion available worldwide.
> >
> >
> > ---- Begin Original Message ----
> >
> > From: "Robert Linders" <mugsnug@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 08:55:41 -0500
> > To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: EasyLanguage protected by copyright ?
> >
> >
> > Dear List members,
> > This list has several smart programmers and (just) maybe we could
> > create a
> > product similar to tradestation.
> > A good graphics engine and a couple of weeks would get me a long way,
> > an
> > open source project (look at unix and such) can be succesfull !
> >
> > However as "trader/programmer" I would not want to move away (too
> > much) from
> > the Easylanguage statements.
> > Although it could be a slightly different syntax, the base would have
> > to be
> > very similar.
> >
> > Would the syntax carry a copyright by Omega that would prohibid the
> > creation
> > of an EasyLanguage "clone" ?
> > Just some thoughts,
> > Robert
> > ===============================
> > Robert Linders
> > Orlando, FL
> > email: mugsnug@xxxxxxxxx
> > ===============================
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---- End Original Message ----
> >
> >
>
|