|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Why didn't you use a limit order? That would have got you out at your price
or better.
FC
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Linders" <mugsnug@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <Omega-List@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:23 AM
Subject: Re: Reader's Choice Awards - TASC Does it again
> I had the following life "QQQ" trade executed yesterday (on TS6):
>
> (from long 800): sell 1600 shares QQQ at MARKET on 1/15/02 1:28:36 pm
(price
> was at 39.98)
> Fills:
> 1/15/02 1:29:52 pm 800 QQQ at 39.9538
> 1/15/02 1:30:38 pm 800 QQQ at 39.9300 <= more than 2 minutes
>
> Does that earn rewards now ?
>
> Robert
> ===============================
> Robert Linders
> Orlando, FL
> email: mugsnug@xxxxxxxxx
> ===============================
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Bronke" <jvbronke@xxxxxxxx>
> To: "Mark Brown" <markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <Omega-List@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 3:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Reader's Choice Awards - TASC Does it again
>
>
> >
> > Mark,
> >
> > Without desiring to be patronizing I can say that you can only
effectively
> > exercise concern on one issue if you don't create another one in the
> > process. I think most would say that by expressing yourself that way
you
> do
> > create another issue. If you don't like TASC just don't subscribe. I got
> > along fine without it until just a few months ago. You can throw them
> away
> > like we can delete emails that we can't be bothered with. Deal with the
> real
> > issue and progress can sometimes be made.
> >
> >
> > Jim Bronke
> > Phoenix, AZ
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Mark Brown" <markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <Omega-List@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 12:57 PM
> > Subject: Re: Reader's Choice Awards - TASC Does it again
> >
> >
> > :
> > : Hello Jim,
> > :
> > : JB> I had to think about this.
> > :
> > : good.
> > :
> > : JB> This is really not an appropriate comment.
> > :
> > : i agree - but neither is the perpetuated RAPE of the general public.
> > :
> > : JB> I have
> > : JB> talked to the new editor(a few months back) and it is a she and it
> is
> > just
> > : JB> not in good taste to make such an inference about a woman.
> > :
> > : the comment apply's to a business ethic or rather a lack thereof.
> > :
> > : JB> If you really think that TASC will compromise its' integrity by
> > : JB> favoring software purely based upon advertising revenue then you
> > : JB> can make that statement.
> > :
> > : then i can make that statement and feel i could certainly defend that
> > : position in a court of law, at least here in the states. i honestly
> > : feel that s&c are crooks with absolutely no integrity at all.
> > :
> > : JB> But, keep it at that. For the sake of common courtesy on our list.
> > : JB> OK?
> > :
> > : no excuses i stand by my act.
> > :
> > :
> > : JB> Jim Bronke
> > : JB> Phoenix, AZ
> > :
> > :
> > :
> > : --
> > :
> > : Have a Great Day, Mark
> > :
> > : http://www.markbrown.com
> > :
> > :
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
|