[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re[2]: Yes on Sharpe Ratio, BUT is it enough?



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


M,

note his last line of conclusion is simply
able to go to sleep without worry if sharpe is 5+ ...

so he is not inferring that less than 5 is bad,
just that he will loose sleep :)

Lawrence


--- "M. Simms" <prosys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ernie, based on your "5 or better " logic, about 99% of the hedgefund
> managers and CTAs would be driving cabs today.
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ernie Bonugli [mailto:ebonugli@xxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 10:32 AM
> > To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re[2]: Yes on Sharpe Ratio, BUT is it enough?
> >
> >
> > The main point I was trying to answer was whether there is more to a
> > successful system than just the Sharpe Ratio.  I posed the question by
> > presenting the result of a system which I developed which shows a
> > relatively "good" Sharpe number and yet we can see that the system
> > goes flat at certain times in its history.  I do not use this system.
> >
> > My personal conclusion is that while Sharpe gives us a very good
> > indicator for the "goodness" of the system, it is not all telling. Or
> > if it is all telling then a system with a ratio of 4 or less is not
> > all that good.  If the Sharpe ratio is the best measure of "goodness" then
> > the system only becomes worthy of being put into production is it exhibits
> > well over a value of 4.  My current best effort is ~4.5.  So a Sharpe of 5
> > or better would allow me to sleep at nite knowing my funds are
> > well invested.
> >
> > So should the scale be read as follows:
> >
> > < 2  - start on another idea, discard this one
> > 2-3  - maybe or "shows potential", if the idea is its primitive
> > form, ie no tweaking.
> > 4-5  - ok, may be production worthy, but keep an eye I on it,
> > 5-10 - good, you can rest now!
> >
> > This scale probably shows my bias and state of affairs.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >  Ernie                            mailto:ebonugli@xxxxxxxx
> >
> 
> 


=====
Lawrence Chan   http://www.tickquest.com    
Transform market data into opportunities