|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I also been using Bob Scott's defrag and have noticed improvement in TS4.
i run it every weekend, after doing scandisk and defrag on the ts4 pc.
tv
But the bravest are surely those who have the greatest vision
of what is before them, glory and danger alike.
And yet notwithstanding go about and meet it.
"Thucydides" 404 BC.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Wynne" <tradewynne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <jack_2231@xxxxxxxxx>; <fritz@xxxxxxxx>; <snptrader@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: Regular maintenance Defrag
>
> >Did you notice any improvement after you defragged?
> >If so, what % increase? Anyone actually notice a real
> >difference?
>
> After running Bob Scott's TS Defrag, TS loaded in 1/2
> the time (tick data files collected back to 1990).
> File size reduced 30%+. Regular defrags are not such
> a big deal.
>
> BW
>
>
>
>
> >From: Jack Griffin <jack_2231@xxxxxxxxx>
> >To: fritz@xxxxxxxx, snptrader <snptrader@xxxxxxxxx>
> >CC: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: Re: Regular maintenance Defrag
> >Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 04:17:06 -0800 (PST)
> >
> >...
> > > them more efficiently. In the case of my fragmented
> > > TS database, the
> > > database file was splattered in 75000 pieces all
> > > around the disk.
> > > Obviously it's a lot less efficient to find things
> > > in that kind of a
> > > mess than if the file is in one piece. No wonder TS
> > > was slow
> > > accessing its database!
> >
> >Did you notice any improvement after you defragged?
> >If so, what % increase? Anyone actually notice a real
> >difference? Or is this defragging just one of those
> >things us geeks harp on for the sake of being geeky?
> >
> >Jack
> >
> >
> >
>
>
|