[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: puzzling probability and roulette a la Mark Brown



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


>Wouldn't go near gambling.  There's no edge to be exploited other than
>perhaps in draw poker.  Well that's not quite true - the house has the edge 
>and they most certainly do exploit it.

Of course, the house hates card counters @ BlackJack, but then again
card counting is a lot like work.

BW


>From: "Mike Higgs" <moongateca@xxxxxxxxx>
>To: "Thomas Alexander" <alexander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,        "David 
>Folster" <mr_bond@xxxxxxxxx>, <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: puzzling probability and roulette a la Mark Brown
>Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 12:48:55 -0500
>
>Tom,
>
> > But I am a little shocked. All of you traders responding but I don't get
>the
> > impression that any of you are actually gamblers. Are you? Any craps
>players
> > out there?
>
>Wouldn't go near gambling.  There's no edge to be exploited other than
>perhaps in draw poker.  Well that's not quite true - the house has the edge
>and they most certainly do exploit it.
>
> > When I can be relaxed, at-ease and fixation free in that paradox, I'll
>call
> > myself a professional trader and my account will happily reflect it.
>
>FWIW, successful trading is boring.  It has no emotion.  There's no
>attachment, no beauty.  With all due respect, I would highly recommend cold
>showers to dull the emotional fervour.  Then go looking for tools that
>substitute for cold showers.
>
>Regard,
>Mike
>
>
>