|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Don your post requires complete response, you asked
for it:
Before selling me a vowel you must figure out the
difference between man and a woman. Adrian is a man
not a woman ( you may read his post to verify...LOL.)
I seriously doubt you know what you are...man or a
woman...it maybe otherwise. You are totally confused.
You purport to be a smart person, figure this, I asked
Adrian for the challenge and posting trades is to find
how he analyses his AGET. It could only be done by
realtime trades and reasons behind each trade using
AGET logic. And thats how you can verify his
statement, and thats how you can prove if he is
telling the truth or not. Would he take this
challenge? of course not. My challenge for his online
trading is creative and constructive. I do not believe
in fairy tales.
Does this all make sense to you? guess not, you are at
very primitive stage. Forget about understanding or
learning trading.
This forum is for Trade Station and it should be left
that way. AGET has no place here.
--- Don Roos <rosewood@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Did you have a bad day Nbik? Care to buy a vowel,
> or would that be too
> expensive?
>
> You have no idea *what* you are talking about. One
> person's experience does
> not mean the entire world's is the same (thank
> goodness). Save your
> rhetoric and spend your time on learning how to
> trade. Questioning others
> veracity and and making challenges is certainly cute
> but not creative nor
> constructive. Why not ask Adrian *how* she does it
> rather than basically
> calling her a liar.
>
> Whether Get worked for you or not, that is
> irrevelant. That you question
> the truthfulness of those that say it works well for
> them is not a
> constructive approach to learning more about
> trading.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nbik" <nsbik@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 8:38 PM
> Subject: Adrian Pitt and AdvancedGET
>
>
> I had AGET for long time, I studied it, attended
> seminars and put my full time in it. Finally to my
> dismay I had to trash it.
> In my opinion, it has no predictive value and all
> the
> wave count is after the fact. Adrian you may even
> see
> a naked woman if you like in this software. LOL.
> You said you work for investment bank ? I seriously
> doubt that, you cannot be making any money for the
> bank using this software...better watchout for your
> job !
> Sooner or later...Adrian you will realise that you
> are
> following a mirage and a useless tool which is
> contributing to your failures.
> Your bank bought the copy for you, maybe your bank
> will purchase my EOD program with hardware lock. I
> will sell it for $100...how about that?
> If you still insist that you got the wonder of the
> world program and you are so good at it then I
> challenge you to give this forum some wonderful
> trades
> based upon this software.
> I have the software and I can easily confirm your
> analysis and trades for this forum. It will settle
> this argument for good.
>
> Good luck to you...specially at your job.
>
> Nbik
>
>
>
>
> --- Adrian Pitt <apitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Adrian, I have been working with a number of
> > proprietary indicators in TS
> > > and another exclusive platform that a friend of
> > mine created for sometime
> > > now and they are far more reliable than what I
> > experienced with AG. AG
> > > reminds me of a quote by Shakespeare, "Advanced
> > GET is a tale told by an
> > > idiot full of sound and fury, signifying
> nothing."
> > Glad to hear you enjoy
> > > it.
> >
> > That's great John. One should go with whatever
> > works for you. Problem is,
> > if
> > what you have now works better than AGET tools,
> its
> > not saying much, as for
> > YOU,
> > AGET tools didn't work!!
> >
> > I know AGET has been around for quite a few years,
> > but I never new
> > Shakespeare used
> > the program as well? WOW....or perhaps I am
> mixing
> > him up and he's just a
> > mate of yours
> > around the corner?
> >
> >
> > > I do know what I'm talking since I've been
> trading
> > exclusively and
> > > successfully for 4 years, but you seem to have
> an
> > ownership stake
> > > in AG, so
> > > you have clearly biased yourself in this
> > discussion. As I
> > > mentioned earlier,
> > > AG does have some proprietary indicators but
> after
> > testing them myself, as
> > > did other traders I know, they are no more
> likely
> > to indicate market
> > > movement than a host of other cheaper indicators
> I
> > have used over
> > > the years.
> >
> > I have an ownership stake in AGET? Yes I admit
> it.
> > Your right. I fully
> > own
> > the copy of AGET I bought :-) I only lease the
> real
> > time version though.
> >
> > Am I biased? YES..your right again. I admit I do
> > like using programs that
> > work well and
> > help make me money for one of the most
> consistently
> > profitable investment
> > banks in the world for over 15 years!!!
> >
> > >
> > > Then maybe you should use your PhD in brain
> > surgery to help
> > > yourself because
> > > it seems you've blown a mental fuse. My "many
> > hours" consisted of days and
> > > days worth of hours, but it doesn't take very
> long
> > to realize
> > > that AG looks
> > > very pretty when looking backwards in time and
> too
> > often, random, when
> > > looking forward.
> >
> > I think you take life too seriously John. You do
> > realise I was joking when
> > I said I became a Brain Surgeon in 3hours!! LOL I
> > think most readers here
> > would
> > have caught the drift of my words.
> >
> > If you told any successful trader in the world,
> one
> > from the Market Wizard
> > book perhaps,
> > that you tried for days and days to learn if you
> > could make money and
> > decided it didn't
> > work, they would laugh. Most of these people go
> > through years and years of
> > learning
> > before becoming successful.
> >
> > >
> > > Glad to hear that it's been stable for you but
> > that wasn't my experience.
> >
> > Perhaps you need a new PC or perhaps do a complete
> > reinstall of your o/s.
> >
> > > Like I said before, I'm glad it works for you
> but
> > it didn't for me nor did
> > > it work for other people I know. Of course,
> since
> > it seems you have a
> > > financial interest in selling AG, your rant
> > against me should be taken by
> > > other traders with a grain of salt.
> >
> > As far as I am concerned john, I would be very
> happy
> > if you PROVED to me
> > that
> > 99% of buyers of AGET couldn't make it work for
> > them. Because that means
> > the
> > tools will be even more successful over time.
> >
> > BTW, you show your lack of objectiveness when you
> > start making rash comments
> > that
> > I have a financial interest in selling AGET. I
>
=== message truncated ===
|