[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Windows 2000 vs Windows XP



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


 This is in part due to the fact that it runs a routine every 6 seconds
or so checking for Identification code. It also has a lot of gadgets
available that have nothing to do with trading.

 Regards,
 Monte



Alex Matulich wrote:
> 
> >I don't care about the privacy/registration issue of Windows XP that has
> >many in a furor.  I just care about stability, performance and
> 
> If you care about performance, then you might want to stay away from
> Windows XP for a while.  It's slower than Windows 2000 in all tests.
> See the InfoWorld report at:
> 
> http://www.infoworld.com/articles/tc/xml/01/10/29/011029tcwinxp.xml
> 
> In my opinion, Windows 98 was the all-around best performing Windows OS.
> 
> --
>  ,|___    Alex Matulich -- alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> // +__>   Director of Research and Development
> //  \
> //___)    Unicorn Research Corporation -- http://unicorn.us.com