|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
For that reason, one should (if possible), but a DSL circuit from an RBOC,
but have it routed to another ISP. The RBOC's switches and routers that
gateway you to the Internet if they're the ISP are always overloaded.
However, if they just had-off the circuit, you'll get amazingly better
performance.
-----Original Message-----
From: craigbud [mailto:craigbud@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:22 AM
To: Scott Hoffman; omega-list
Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC: Cable or DSL?
The baby bells win, as predicted. PacBell fought hard to control the DSL
market, but was forced to open it. In the end it didn't matter. I've had
their DSL since the time they offered it and it's good overall. However,
there were a number of times the service was practically unusable. I don't
quite understand how the DSL circuit works, but I know I have several more
DSL neighbors with an appetite for data. There was a period when the
service was practically unusable during lunchtime and mid afternoon,
perhaps reflecting the lunch break, and the flood of teenagers racing home
from school to download their porno and music.
At 10:43 AM 8/23/2001 -0700, Scott Hoffman wrote:
>Here's the experience I had: Qwest would not provide DSL for my home. They
>said my line did not qualify. Then I called Earthlink and they said my line
>was within distance parameters so they sent someone to Qwest's own CO and
>qualified my line. I do not understand why a third party ISP was able to
set
>my line up for DSL when the company that owns the line said it could not be
>done. FYI, I have had it for a month now and it works fine. Consistant 1Mbs
>downloads.
>
>The moral of the story is that Colin's idea sounds good to me, but maybe
the
>RBOC (I presume this is Qwest in my case) won't set your line up even
though
>you can get DSL service from the ISP directly.
>
>SH
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "caw" <cwest@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: "Omega List" <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 7:39 PM
>Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC: Cable or DSL?
>
>
> > Given the many failures of companies offering DSL, I'd strongly suggest
> > buying your DSL circuit from your RBOC, and request them to route it to
an
> > ISP of you choice. If the ISP fails or their service becomes
>unsatisfactory,
> > it's quite easy to re-route your circuit in a few hours to another ISP
> > without any downtime. Perhaps I'll write a "paper" about this stuff for
> > traders2traders.com :)
> >
> > Colin West
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Harris [mailto:baldeagle99@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 8:01 PM
> > To: Omega List
> > Subject: OFF TOPIC: Cable or DSL?
> >
> > Thank you to: caw, Tim, Bobh, GE, and erwilm45 for your opinions on DSL
> > & cable. I'll probably go with DSL - only because cable will not be
> > available for about a year in my area.
> >
> > Thanks again.
> >
> > Mike
> >
|