|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
My mistake, periodicity was not 360. Still think a cyclical function is not
a good test.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pierre.orphelin [mailto:pierre.orphelin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: den 30 juli 2001 21:43
> To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: TradeStation Precision - Summary
>
>
>
>
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Bengtsson, Mats [mailto:mats.bengtsson@xxxxxxxx]
> > Envoyé : lundi 30 juillet 2001 19:40
> > À : pierre.orphelin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Objet : RE:
> > TradeStation Precision - Summary
> >
> >
> > Well, my fought was that since the function is cyclic, you
> are doing
> > the same thing every 360 bars 180 of them are the opposite of the
> > other 180. Besides xaverage does not accumulate by design,
> so it did
> > not feel like a good test.
> >
>
> The period was 1000 bars and not 360!
> The second test where I added 2, voids your remark that was
> not corect anyway ( you may have read that the propagation
> error was showing in this case, and not with the xaverge of a
> constant.
>
> Encore un qui ne suit pas...
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Pierre Orphelin
> www.sirtrade.com
> TradeStation Technologies representative in France
>
>
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Cap Gemini Ernst & Young Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
|