[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: cruz, pro, 2000i: suck it up!



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

tradejack:

makes for a good soundbite.  unfortunately it's horsefeathers.  software is
not fungible like a share of stock or a futures contract.  if you have a an
actual codebase in EL and VB, there's major pain.

-----Original Message-----
From: tradejack@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tradejack@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 10:00 PM
To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: cruz, pro, 2000i: suck it up!


if you're properly positioned in the trading sw game like in the markets,
 then it doesn't matter. trading markets or trading sw, there's no
difference.
never fear, there will be other companies to fill the void, so the success
or failure of the cruz's and omega is unimportant.  when omega (under the
threat of lawsuit) fixed ts4 y2k problems, then further ts upgrades became
irrevelant. and with dynastore, i can get the newest and latest feeds, like
genv. that's why billie and ralphie are in the brokerage game and out of
sw

when i'm trading big bucks day after day, night after night, a stable
platform
is a hell of a lot more important to me than technological prowess. pro
/ bs100 are still damaged goods and unworthy of my support now

TJ

always covering my ass when others fubar

did i mention that ds will support genv? :))


At Sat, 23 Jun 2001 19:55:01 -0700, "John Hamon" <jhamon@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

>take a look at tradestation-dot->com's financials and you will see a failed
business model up to now.  to those of you make your living from the market:
would you rather these guys stayed in business or not?