[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Bad Ticks ( was Re: TRAD announces autoexecution



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

In a message dated 06/15/2001 9:37:54 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
omega-digest-request@xxxxxxxxxx writes:

> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 22:15:27 -0600 (CDT)
>  From: tradejack@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>  To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>  Subject: Re: TRAD announces autoexecution

>  Message-Id: <200106150339.UAA25737@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  ....
>  it's difficult to figure out on the fly if what appears to be a bad tick 
>  is actually a bad tick...the floor is particularly adept in creating 
phantom 
>  bad ticks to trigger clustered stops and then fade the result of their 
> handiwork. as more floor traders migrate to off-floor e-trading, they may 
try their 
>  old tricks or invent new ones.
>  
>  TJ
>  

There is a fairly simple solution.  Use a second window with a very small 
number of ticks per bar (one if possible).  That way you can see if a tick 
is an abberation or a suddend change in direction.  High-volume stocks 
may have more than the 13,000 bar limit of TS4, but even at 10 ticks per 
bar a bad tick is very obvious.  Those bars go by very quickly, even at ten 
per.

You could program this into a sytem.  Find the bad tick in the tick window 
by comparing to previous and following bars, and feed that into your system
via Global Variables.  This will get you down to a 10-second delay or so.

donc