[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TRAD announces autoexecution



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


--- Jim Bronke <jvbronke@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That's where I'd expect the bad tick to come from.

If you trade you know what I mean: some "bad" ticks are
busted trades, some are not. A recent 50 point spike
in the ES was busted weeks/days(?) later. I've seen other
spikes that were "good" and not busted. How are you going to
filter that if there is no warm body around?

BW


> 
> Jim Bronke
> Phoenix, AZ
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "B W" <tradewynne@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Jim Bronke" <jvbronke@xxxxxxxx>; "Bill Wynne"
> <tradewynne@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
> <catapult@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 8:29 AM
> Subject: Re: TRAD announces autoexecution
> 
> 
> >
> > --- Jim Bronke <jvbronke@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > The system definitely needs a bad tick filter.
> >
> > What if the "bad" tick is from the exchange? What
> > if the feed or your system is a few seconds slow?
> >
> > BW
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Jim Bronke
> > > Phoenix, AZ
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Bill Wynne" <tradewynne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <catapult@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 8:11 AM
> > > Subject: Re: TRAD announces autoexecution
> > >
> > >
> > > > I agree, and there are so many details beyond or marginally
> > > > under TRAD's control: bad ticks, bad orders, etc. With the
> > > > current state of E-markets and data I wouldn't turn my account
> > > > over to my 'puter and/or Bill and Ralph. Would you fly the
> > > > Concord with no pilot on board and the Cruz crew playing with
> > > > the joy-stick on the ground?
> > > >
> > > > It'd be nice to have something like this "park" the orders and
> > > > then you single click to send on TS4....
> > > >
> > > > BW
> > > >
> > > > >From: DH <catapult@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >To: Omega List <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >Subject: Re: TRAD announces autoexecution
> > > > >Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 07:48:52 -0700
> > > > >
> > > > > > FWIW, my prognostication is that progressively within a year
> TRAD
> > > will
> > > > >be
> > > > > > able to deliver or provide an online trading application and
> service
> > > > >that
> > > > > > integrates stocks, futures, and options on both.
> > > > >
> > > > ><rant mode on>
> > > > >
> > > > >FWIW, my prognostication is the very best TRAD can hope for is to
> > > > >achieve the quality of IB..... great when it works but you're SOL
> and
> > > it
> > > > >costs you big money with no recourse when it doesn't.
> > > > >
> > > > >There's a lot more to being a good broker than providing flashy
> looking
> > > > >software. For starters, the software and computer infrastructure
> should
> > > > >be 100% reliable (belt) and, when that fails, there should be a
> good
> > > > >phone backup (suspenders) where you promptly get a real broker on
> the
> > > > >line, not some techno nerd who tells you to reboot your computer
> and
> > > try
> > > > >again. Would anyone seriously consider trusting their trading
> account
> > > to
> > > > >the Cruz brothers? Do you believe they will make it right when they
> > > mess
> > > > >up and cost you money? I sure as hell don't. It would be like
> putting
> > > > >your life savings in 'Crazy Joe's Used Car Lot and Savings Bank.'
> :-)
> > > > >
> > > > ><rant mode off>
> > > > >
> > > > >--
> > > > >   Dennis
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more.
> > http://buzz.yahoo.com/
> >
>