|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hello EdCReeve,
Eac> I would think that before someone actually sent them a system, they would at
Eac> some point take a look at their main product, which is the printed
Eac> publication, and this is clearly stated on Page 1 of the printed publication.
the lack of consistency in both their story and their media should be
enough to bring into question their abilities to accurately report
systems results.
Eac> My challenge to find something specific was evidence of Mark Brown's claim
Eac> that "the models have been tampered with to keep their ranking" (Mark's
Eac> words).
below are the commodities listed in the aberration manual around 1998
and around 1995 - 22 of the 35 commodities listed had changed their
optimal input values.
(commodity) (98 values) and (95 values)
corn 69 - 69
oats 123 - 123
soybeans 123 - 113
soy meal 107 - 107
soy oil - 23 - 23
wheat 80 - 157
live cattle 140 - 140
live hogs 62 - 62
pork bellies 79 - 118
cocoa 145 - 145
coffee 61 - 32
sugar 55 - 38
cotton 74 - 75
orange juice 50 - 40
copper 150 - 150
silver 80 - 85
gold 127 - 100
platinum 150 - 149
palladium 119 - 119
crude oil 33 - 31
heating oil 27 - 33
unleaded gas 100 - 150
jap yen 61 - 35
german mark 68 - 68
swiss franc 66 - 65
british pound 76 - 53
canadian dollar 77 - 150
dollar index 80 - 74
t bonds 148 - 148
t notes 53 - 57
t bills 69 - 65
euro dollar 32 - 32
muni bonds 45 - 120
sp 500 91 - 90
nyse 89 -89
so you argument is that john hill and his bunch didn't know that these
numbers had been changed to keep this systems rankings in the top ten?
big snip of boring stuff..
mark
|