|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hello Lawrence,
let me guess - your a solution provider and/or was a beta tester who
is actually not paying for the program. just a wild guess, since i
can not find the list of solution providers now on omega's site.
excuse me if i'm wrong - but nothing else is logical to me. mark
Thursday, December 07, 2000, 9:35:10 AM, you wrote:
LP> I downloaded it yesterday and began experimenting with it immediately.
LP> My first impression is that it is much less of a computer resource user
LP> than 2000i. While the lack of data(one month available)makes it not
LP> useful for any testing or analysis, it is certainly an alternative for
LP> one's trading platform. I use several computers and have found that
LP> 2000i works best in a very stripped down manner when using it to trade
LP> in real time. I presently only collect real time data on 45 symbols and
LP> only actively trade 8 symbols. So it would seem that Tradestation.Pro
LP> would be an alternative for that utilization. Of course over time,
LP> there will be more data and it will have more use. Since I maintain two
LP> data feeds anyway(one for backup)it seems that the $99 is a reasonable
LP> cost to replace one of the two. The data seems very clean(a big
LP> improvement over past Omega performance). The tracking center is
LP> running late from the charts, but I am only running it on a 166 with
LP> 48mg of ram, so that doesn't surprise me. It's functionality is almost
LP> exactly the same as 2000i, and my systems and indicators perform
LP> perfectly. When one considers that we spent thousands of dollars for
LP> 2000i, Tradestation.Pro seems like a bargain. I won't be using it to
LP> trade for at least a month and intend to keep it running to see where
LP> the potential problems may be.
LP> Lawrence Price
--
Best regards,
Mark Brown mailto:markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Y = Offset + Amplitude * sin(Frequency * X)
|