[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Proposed experiment for WOW users



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

I have also tried them all and to be honest MB Trading is the fastest of all
of them.  Why?  Because MBT does not use PCQ or S&P like the others.
Instead of inserting a middle man (consolidated data provider) like the
others mentioned MBT went the more costly way of puling there own NQDS
(LVLII) and NTDS (T&S), SIAC and CME lines.  Those are the lines that come
right off the exchange servers.  The feeds is far more reliable.  With
regard to bandwidth, MBT has there own OC-3's and OC-48's, in other words
they don't tap into them, they in fact own them.
I have compared and have learned.  You get what you pay for.  Period!  Ask
any FREE Watley user or CyberTrader user.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Brown [mailto:markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 8:37 PM
To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Proposed experiment for WOW users


Hello  Ullrich,

i  can  tell  you right now that cybercorp should beat them all.  they
are  setting  on  one of the only two oc 192 backbones in the country,
they use sp comstock as a back up.  the whole reason they use pcq over
spc,  is speed.  i honestly belive whatever is the best for the client
that  is  what  cybercorp  will  do.   that's  what  has  made them so
formidable.

wow  is up here in richardson which means that they have to go through
the    dallas   bottleneck  to  get  data out.  they use spc as a data
feed.

mark




Tuesday, October 31, 2000, 8:16:30 PM, you wrote:

UF> I would like to call up a current WOW user by telephone during market
hours
UF> and compare how up to date the WOW (Windows on Wall Street) datafeed is
UF> compared to what I'm seeing from Cybercorp (forwarded through their
servers
UF> from PCQUOTE) and possibly www.equitytrading.com (when I get their feed
set
UF> up).  I may also be able to arrange to have a friend call you up and
UF> compare the WOW speed to his feed from mbTrading.  Anyone interested,
UF> please reply directly to me by email and include your telephone number
and
UF> when you would like to be called.  I have found several free and fixed
cost
UF> long distance services, so there is no extra cost to me for making the
UF> phone call.  The idea is to read off the T&S prints to each other and
try
UF> to determine from the pattern of prints how far apart in time the prints
UF> are coming in and which service is faster.



--
Best regards,
  Mark Brown   mailto:markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Y = Offset + Amplitude * sin(Frequency * X)