|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
My trading buddies that use Cyber are getting ready to dump it because of
reliability problems and quotes falling behind at times.
In a message dated 10/31/00 7:40:07 PM Pacific Standard Time,
markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> Hello Ullrich,
>
> i can tell you right now that cybercorp should beat them all. they
> are setting on one of the only two oc 192 backbones in the country,
> they use sp comstock as a back up. the whole reason they use pcq over
> spc, is speed. i honestly belive whatever is the best for the client
> that is what cybercorp will do. that's what has made them so
> formidable.
>
> wow is up here in richardson which means that they have to go through
> the dallas bottleneck to get data out. they use spc as a data
> feed.
>
> mark
>
>
>
>
> Tuesday, October 31, 2000, 8:16:30 PM, you wrote:
>
> UF> I would like to call up a current WOW user by telephone during market
> hours
> UF> and compare how up to date the WOW (Windows on Wall Street) datafeed
is
> UF> compared to what I'm seeing from Cybercorp (forwarded through their
> servers
> UF> from PCQUOTE) and possibly www.equitytrading.com (when I get their
feed
> set
> UF> up). I may also be able to arrange to have a friend call you up and
> UF> compare the WOW speed to his feed from mbTrading. Anyone interested,
> UF> please reply directly to me by email and include your telephone number
> and
> UF> when you would like to be called. I have found several free and fixed
> cost
> UF> long distance services, so there is no extra cost to me for making the
> UF> phone call. The idea is to read off the T&S prints to each other and
> try
> UF> to determine from the pattern of prints how far apart in time the
prints
>
> UF> are coming in and which service is faster.
>
|