|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Igor--
You asked for a response and you got several, all civil and honest as I see
it. Certainly not personal. I suspect you think if the response is'nt what
you want to hear that you take it personally. I express my opinion to you
as you have to me. I don't make the rules and don't care to. If you don't
like my answer, say you disagree and make your own choices.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Igor Kaplun" <ikaplun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Jim Johnson" <jejohn@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "OMEGA-LIST" <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2000 10:03 AM
Subject: Re: I need your responce
> See answer in a body of letter
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jim Johnson <jejohn@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Igor Kaplun <ikaplun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; omegalist
> <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: OMEGA-LIST <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2000 8:46 AM
> Subject: Re: I need your responce
>
>
> > Igor--
> >
> > I prefer that the Omega List not contain individual opinions about
> market
> > direction, trades etc.
>
> We all here on a List as individuals.
> We all here because we are traders and using Omega products.
> We all here trying to share with each other our thoughts. We are
> asking for help and expressing our opinions.
>
> > There are other lists more suited to that.
> > I could screen your posts so as not to see them, but this would
> presumably
> > deny me from seeing other of your posts that I might want to read.
> >
> > When you first posted a trade, I asked you on what basis you were
> making it.
> > You elected not to reveal anything about your methodology. That is
> another
> > reason I have no interest in it.
>
> Do not get personally, please. Shame on you, man!
>
> > Create a subscription processs if you like. Occasionally inform the
> Omega
> > List of its existence and how to sign up. No problem. but don't
> use the
> > list as your semi-captive audience.
> >
>
> Why do not you begin to construct RULES and REGULATIONS for the List?
> You would be good in it, Jim.
> >
>
|