[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Sharpe ratio = 1.45 from free system



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


45.13 .... Max Drawdown (percent) on 920521 
239 .... Days in longest drawdown ending on 960405 




> Here's a www link to a free system download
> in Omega .ela format (and also plain ASCII
> for TS3 users) that tests out to have a
> much better than average Sharpe ratio:
> 
>    http://traderclub.com/discus/messages/18/444.html
> 
> Using the exact same code and the exact same parameter
> values to trade 20 different commodity futures markets,
> the system's backtest results were
> 
>  72.85 .... Compound Annual Growth Rate (percent per yr) 
>  1.458 .... Sharpe Ratio 
>  2.097 .... Semideviation Ratio 
>  6.248 .... Return Retracement Ratio 
>  1.645 .... Sterling Ratio 
> 
> 
> All those other ratios (Semideviation, RRR, Sterling)
> are alternative ways to quantify "Reward per unit Risk"
> for those who don't like the Sharpe Ratio.  One such
> person is Jack Schwager and he discusses AT LENGTH
> his reasons for not liking Sharpe, and for liking these
> others, in his book "Managed Trading: Myths and Truths".
> 
> As you can see, in backtesting [NOT the same as
> real trading with real fills], the freebie system's
> Sharpe Ratio handily beats the pants off practically
> every CTA fund in existence.  A complete daily equity
> curve is also provided in Excel format, for those who
> may wish to compute Sharpe ratios themselves based on
> weekly returns, monthly returns, quarterly returns,
> however you like.  Download the numbers and
> crunch away.
> 
> The basic oscillator inside this system closely
> mimic's Bollinger's "%B" oscillator, but instead
> of using standard deviation as an approximation
> of "volatility", this system's oscillator uses
> an exponential moving average of Welles Wilder's
> TrueRange as an approximation of "volatility".
> If you will, it replaces "Bollinger Bands" by
> "XMATR Bands".  Dennis Holverstott was, to my
> knowledge anyway, the first person to correctly
> point this out.
> 
> (The system appeared on the omega-list a while ago,
> but I don't know of any omega-list archive sites on
> the web, to which I might provide a hyperlink.  sorry.)
>