[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CME May Just Eat CBOT’s Lunch



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Jim:

I agree there will be similar regulatory requirements for single stock 
futures and stocks.  It won't be 10% margin, but rather 50% as set by the SEC 
or Fed.  But the hedge margin short the futures, long the stock will be much 
smaller, IMHO.

I agree that the tax treatment of stocks and futures will need to be leveled 
and that may take some time.

However, being a futures guy, I think there could be some structural 
advantages that the single stock futures may bring which could give them an 
initial edge.  For example, there was a call in securities side for a central 
single order book to ensure best execution practices.  Futures would offer 
that via electronic trading.  There would be no uptick rule in the futures.  
Futures and stocks can be margined in the same account.  Increased 
transparency and no designated specialists or payment for order flow will 
also help the futures, IMHO. 

I think Washington understands that the futures industry is under siege from 
foreign competition and they want to do something to help keep these markets 
on U.S. shores.  Thus, the momentum behind allowing single stock futures.

Single stock futures virtually exist today.  Sell a call and buy a put of the 
same month and strike price on an individual stock issue and you have a 
virtual short futures contract.  The introduction of single stock futures 
will only increase efficiency and reduce costs for something that already 
exists and create new opportunities to lay off risk, spread markets and 
arbitrage instruments and its derivatives.  I think they have a chance to be 
very popular.

Regards,

John J. Lothian

Disclosure: Futures trading involves financial risk, lots of it!

Disclosure: John J. Lothian is the President of the Electronic Trading 
Division of The Price Futures Group, Inc., an Introducing Broker.



In a message dated 07/06/2000 11:44:27 PM Central Daylight Time, 
tagteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

<< Sure. Further, why would anyone want to daytrade stocks via
 shops like All-Tech with their 50% margin requirements and
 $20-25 per ticket charges when they can trade futures on the
 same stocks? Plus, why trade equity options with their
 similarly high commission structure and margin requirements?
 Single stock futures with a $10/RT commission rate, 10%
 initial margin, and 60/40 tax treatment?!? Too good to be
 true......
 
 ....and maybe it is because those whose respective ox would
 be gored are already crying foul. The CBOE, for one, has
 already noted, most vociferously, that the playing field is
 already manifestly unfair and removing the Shad-Johnson
 prohibition on single stock futures would only make matters
 worse. Hence, the plea for regulating single stock futures
 under "proper securities laws protections". Translation =
 same margin requirements, fees, and tax treatment for single
 stock futures as for options and stocks. That's one huge
 bucket of cold water, IMHO.
 
 The point is, while I think single stock futures would be
 great, I believe the regulatory scheme that will eventually
 evolve might severely limit the growth potential.
 
 Best regards,
 Jim >>