|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
With UHF/ULF tapes, you are suppose to be able to make a gadget that
can let you hear the messages. With the rest, you can't. Energy masking
destroys signal. Strong masking signal together with Weak message signal,
what's left is only strong masking signal. Basically, loud noise drowns out
an trace of the softer sounds.
So in God you trust ... and let the tape maker tied up the camel, if he
does :-)
At 02:39 AM 7/6/00, Kent Rollins wrote:
>How do you know the tapes don't say "Buy more tapes. Spread the word."
>
>Kent
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: MatteoRicci_LiMatuo@xxxxxxxxx <MatteoRicci_LiMatuo@xxxxxxxxx>
>To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 2:24 PM
>Subject: Re: Subliminal learning/behavior modification tapes -- Consumer
>Reports request
>
>
>They are the ones I was referring to.
>
>But don't forget the NLP calibration "protocol"
>if you really want to talk with your subconscious or
>unihipili as a start.
>
>With a tape, it is extremely inflexible compared to the
>above or a hypnotherapist.
>
>At 10:13 PM 7/5/00, Terry Wyss wrote:
> >How about the tapes with the suggestions recorded just
> >above and just below the normal human frequency range
> >rather
> >than overlapping and masked? The vendors at this url
> >claim
> >that they have excellent results, have sold to various
> >US and foreign
> >government branches and have only recently become
> >declassified:
> >http://silent.home.mindspring.com/silent2.htm
> >
> >MatteoRicci_LiMatuo@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >
> > > Some of us here should consider signing up with something
> > > www.expertise.com or themutual.com as experts and get
> > > something from it :-)
> > >
> > > There's only 1 auditory "subliminal" product that works. It was
> > > used on the Iraqis in the gulf war and mentioned of the approach
> > > turned up in a HK movie about 2 years ago.
> > > It is very expensive, 4 digits I think to a single customised recording.
> > > I keep in touch with these sort of things as it was my research
> > > speciality awhile back.
|