|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
hahahhahahah!!!!!! This is not the first time I've seen some 'surprise'
that the numbers did not come out more fib-like. Perhaps with a larger
sample....
Kind regards,
Monte
Bob Fulks wrote:
>
> At 11:57 PM -0700 6/22/00, Monte C. Smith wrote:
>
> >Among those who did use Fibonacci numbers, 33% are said to have done
> >so in a 'casual' manner.
>
> That's funny. I calculated that it was 38.2%
>
> <g>
|